Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DA DSM [II]

Short telephoto prime lens • Digital era

Announced:
· July 2023
Production status:
● In production
Country of design:
· PRC (People's Republic of China)
Original name:
· Ynlens YN50mm F1.8 DA DSM
Class:
· Fast APS-C-format short telephoto prime lens

Abbreviations

DA	The lens is designed for APS-C digital mirrorless cameras.
DSM	The lens is equipped with Digital Stepping Motor.
II	Second generation.

Model history (2)

■Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DA DSM		A	8 - 7	0.45m	⌀49	2020 ●
■Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DA DSM [II]		A	8 - 7	0.45m	⌀49	2023 ●

Specification

Optical design:
Maximum format:	APS-C
Focal length:	50mm
Speed:	F/1.8
Lens construction:	8 elements in 7 groups
	1 LD
	Internal focusing (IF)
Mount:	Fujifilm X
	Nikon Z
	Sony E
Diagonal angle of view:	31.8° (Fujifilm X APS-C)
	31.6° (Nikon Z APS-C)
	31.6° (Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C)
On Fujifilm X APS-C [1.52x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	76mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/2.7 (in terms of depth of field)
On Nikon Z APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	76.5mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/2.8 (in terms of depth of field)
On Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	76.5mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/2.8 (in terms of depth of field)
Diaphragm mechanism:
Diaphragm type:	Automatic
Aperture control:	None; the aperture is controlled from the camera
Number of blades:	7 (seven)
Focusing:
Closest focusing distance:	0.45m
Magnification ratio:	1:7.14
Focusing modes:	Autofocus (AF), Manual focus (MF)
Autofocus motor:	Stepping motor
Manual focus control:	Focusing ring
Focus mode selector:	None; focusing mode is set from the camera
Manual focus override in autofocus mode:	Determined by the camera
Optical Image Stabilizer (OIS):
Built-in OIS:	-
Physical characteristics:
Weight:	134g (Fujifilm X)
	148g (Nikon Z)
	134g (Sony E)
Maximum diameter x Length:	⌀64×58mm (Fujifilm X)
	⌀64×58mm (Nikon Z)
	⌀64×58mm (Sony E)
Weather sealing:	Water-resistant mount
Fluorine coating:	Yes
Accessories:
Filters:	Screw-type 49mm
Lens hood:	LH-52 T - Bayonet-type round
Teleconverters:	Not available

Source of data

Manufacturer's technical data.

From the editor

An updated version of the 50/1.8 DA DSM, which received an improved autofocus algorithm, a fluorine coating on the front element, and a water-resistant mount. In addition to the Sony E mount, it is now available for the Nikon Z and Fujifilm X mounts.

Note: The Fujifilm X-mount version does not have a water-resistant mount.

Lenses with similar focal length

■Nikon Z mount (9)
7Artisans AF 50mm F/1.8 • ⌀62		2024 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Full frame · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (450g vs 148g) · Much larger (100mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Meike AF 50mm F/1.8 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	0	4
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 4 · Full frame · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.63m vs 0.45m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (382g vs 148g) · Much larger (103.2mm vs 58mm) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Meike AF 55mm F/1.8 Pro STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.45m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (364g vs 148g) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 50mm F/1.8 S • ⌀62		2018 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.45m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:7.14) · Has focus mode selector (A - M) · Much heavier (415g vs 148g) · Much larger (86.5mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 50mm F/1.2 S • ⌀82	Pro	2020 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:7.14) · Has focus mode selector (A - M) · Much heavier (1090g vs 148g) · Much larger (150mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (82mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 50mm F/1.4 • ⌀62	Pro	2024 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.37m vs 0.45m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (420g vs 148g) · Much larger (86.5mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 50mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2020) · Discontinued · Full frame · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (390g vs 148g) · Much larger (89.9mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Larger filter size (55mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 50mm F/2 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀58		2025 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly slower · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.51m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:9.09 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (220g vs 148g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DF DSM • ⌀58		2021 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:7.14) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (417g vs 148g) · Much larger (87mm vs 58mm) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE

■Nikon Z mount (9) · APS-C
Brightin Star AF 50mm F/1.4 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Slightly faster · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (450g vs 148g) · Larger (79mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Meike AF 55mm F/1.4 STM • ⌀52	Pro	2024 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.61m vs 0.45m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (286g vs 148g) · Larger (76mm vs 58mm) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
SG-Image AF 55mm F/1.8 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	0	5
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 5 · Narrower angle of view · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (365g vs 148g) · Larger (78mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 56mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀55	Pro	2018 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2018) · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:7.4 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (295g vs 148g) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (55mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 56mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	1	5
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 5 · Narrower angle of view · Faster · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (427g vs 148g) · Much larger (94.2mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE
TTArtisan AF 56mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Narrower angle of view · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (250g vs 148g) · Slightly larger (69mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 56mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2020) · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (320g vs 148g) · Larger (73mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 56mm F/1.7 ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:9.09 vs 1:7.14) · Heavier (187g vs 148g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 56mm F/1.4 DA DSM WL • ⌀58	Pro	2024 ●	compare	0	4
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 4 · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:9.09 vs 1:7.14) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (375g vs 148g) · Much larger (89mm vs 58mm) · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE

■Sony E mount (21)
7Artisans AF 50mm F/1.8 • ⌀62		2024 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Full frame · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (424g vs 134g) · Much larger (98mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Meike AF 50mm F/1.8 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	0	4
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 4 · Full frame · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.63m vs 0.45m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (382g vs 134g) · Much larger (103.2mm vs 58mm) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Meike AF 55mm F/1.8 Pro STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.45m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (364g vs 134g) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Samyang AF 50mm F/1.4 FE • ⌀67 akaRokinon AF 50mm F/1.4 FE	Pro	2016 ●	compare	0	4
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2016) · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (585g vs 134g) · Much larger (97.7mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Samyang AF 45mm F/1.8 FE • ⌀49 akaRokinon AF 45mm F/1.8 FE		2019 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:8.33 vs 1:7.14) · Heavier (162g vs 134g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating HIDE
Samyang AF 50mm F/1.4 FE II • ⌀72 akaRokinon AF 50mm F/1.4 FE II	Pro	2021 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.45m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.25 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (420g vs 134g) · Much larger (88.9mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (72mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 45mm F/2.8 DG [DN] \| C • ⌀55		2019 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.24m vs 0.45m) · Larger magnification (1:4 vs 1:7.14) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (235g vs 134g) · Slightly smaller (48.2mm vs 58mm) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (55mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 50mm F/1.4 DG HSM \| A • ⌀77	Pro	2018 ●	compare	0	4
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Slightly faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Floating element system · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.45m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:5.6 vs 1:7.14) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (880g vs 134g) · Much larger (125.9mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (77mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 50mm F/1.4 DG DN \| A • ⌀72	Pro	2023 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.8 vs 1:7.14) · High-response Linear Actuator instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (660g vs 134g) · Much larger (111.5mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (72mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 50mm F/2 DG [DN] \| C • ⌀58		2023 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.9 vs 1:7.14) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (345g vs 134g) · Larger (70mm vs 58mm) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 50mm F/1.2 DG DN \| A • ⌀72	Pro	2024 ●	compare	3	3
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (13 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.45m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.2 vs 1:7.14) · High-response Linear Actuator instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (740g vs 134g) · Much larger (110.8mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (72mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sony FE Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 55mm F/1.8 ZA [SEL55F18Z] • ⌀49		2013 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2013) · Full frame · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (281g vs 134g) · Larger (71mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating HIDE
Sony FE 50mm F/1.8 [SEL50F18F] • ⌀49		2016 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2016) · Full frame · Aspherical design · Micromotor · Heavier (186g vs 134g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating HIDE
Sony FE ZEISS Planar T* 50mm F/1.4 ZA SSM [SEL50F14Z] • ⌀72	Pro	2016 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2016) · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:7.14) · Ring Drive Super Sonic Wave Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (778g vs 134g) · Much larger (108mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (72mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sony FE 50mm F/1.2 GM [SEL50F12GM] • ⌀72	Pro	2021 ●	compare	3	3
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.45m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:7.14) · XD Linear Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (778g vs 134g) · Much larger (108mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (72mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sony FE 50mm F/2.5 G [SEL50F25G] • ⌀49		2021 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.45m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:5.56 vs 1:7.14) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Heavier (174g vs 134g) · Smaller (45mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating HIDE
Sony FE 50mm F/1.4 GM [SEL50F14GM] • ⌀67	Pro	2023 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.41m vs 0.45m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.25 vs 1:7.14) · XD Linear Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (516g vs 134g) · Much larger (96mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (67mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 50mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2020) · Discontinued · Full frame · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (350g vs 134g) · Much larger (88.2mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Larger filter size (55mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 50mm F/2 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀58		2025 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly slower · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.51m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:9.09 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (205g vs 134g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DF DSM • ⌀58		2021 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:7.14) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (395g vs 134g) · Much larger (85mm vs 58mm) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE
SongRaw Moonlit 50mm F/1.2 • ⌀72	Pro	2025 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (13 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.52m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:7.14) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (900g vs 134g) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (72mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE

■Sony E mount (12) · APS-C
Brightin Star AF 50mm F/1.4 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Slightly faster · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (450g vs 134g) · Larger (79mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Meike AF 55mm F/1.4 STM • ⌀52	Pro	2024 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.61m vs 0.45m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (286g vs 134g) · Larger (76mm vs 58mm) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
SG-Image AF 55mm F/1.8 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	0	5
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 5 · Narrower angle of view · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (365g vs 134g) · Larger (78mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 56mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀55	Pro	2018 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2018) · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:7.4 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (280g vs 134g) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (55mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 56mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	1	5
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 5 · Narrower angle of view · Faster · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (422g vs 134g) · Much larger (92.5mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sony E 50mm F/1.8 OSS [SEL50F18] • ⌀49		2011 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2011) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.38m vs 0.45m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.25 vs 1:7.14) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Has image stabilizer · Much heavier (202g vs 134g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating HIDE
TTArtisan AF 56mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Narrower angle of view · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (233g vs 134g) · Slightly larger (67mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Tokina atx-m 56mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2021 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (315g vs 134g) · Larger (72mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 56mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2020) · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (290g vs 134g) · Larger (72mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 56mm F/1.7 ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:9.09 vs 1:7.14) · Heavier (170g vs 134g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 56mm F/1.4 DA DSM WL • ⌀58	Pro	2024 ●	compare	0	4
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 4 · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:9.09 vs 1:7.14) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (375g vs 134g) · Much larger (89mm vs 58mm) · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DA DSM • ⌀49		2020 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating HIDE

■Fujifilm X mount (1)
Meike AF 55mm F/1.8 Pro STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.45m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (364g vs 134g) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE

■Fujifilm X mount (15) · APS-C
Brightin Star AF 50mm F/1.4 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Slightly faster · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (450g vs 134g) · Larger (79mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 56mm F/1.2 Aspherical R • ⌀62	Pro	2014 ●	compare	2	7
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 7 · Older model (2014) · Discontinued · Narrower angle of view · Faster · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Larger closest focusing distance (0.70m vs 0.45m) · Smaller magnification (1:11.11 vs 1:7.14) · Micromotor · Much heavier (405g vs 134g) · Larger (69.7mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 56mm F/1.2 Aspherical R APD • ⌀62	Pro	2014 ●	compare	3	6
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 6 · Older model (2014) · Narrower angle of view · Faster · Aspherical design · Optimized for more impressive and pleasing bokeh than conventional portrait lenses · Has aperture ring · Larger closest focusing distance (0.70m vs 0.45m) · Smaller magnification (1:11.11 vs 1:7.14) · Micromotor · Much heavier (405g vs 134g) · Larger (69.7mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 50mm F/2 Aspherical R WR • ⌀46		2017 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2017) · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.39m vs 0.45m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (200g vs 134g) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 50mm F/1 Aspherical R WR • ⌀77	Pro	2020 ●	compare	3	5
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 5 · Older model (2020) · Faster · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.70m vs 0.45m) · Smaller magnification (1:12.5 vs 1:7.14) · Micromotor · Much heavier (845g vs 134g) · Much larger (103.5mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (77mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 56mm F/1.2 Aspherical R WR • ⌀67	Pro	2022 ●	compare	3	4
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 4 · Narrower angle of view · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Micromotor · Much heavier (445g vs 134g) · Larger (76mm vs 58mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (67mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Meike AF 55mm F/1.4 STM • ⌀52	Pro	2024 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.61m vs 0.45m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (286g vs 134g) · Larger (76mm vs 58mm) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
SG-Image AF 55mm F/1.8 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	0	5
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 5 · Narrower angle of view · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (365g vs 134g) · Larger (78mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 56mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀55	Pro	2018 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2018) · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:7.4 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (280g vs 134g) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (55mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 56mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	1	5
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 5 · Narrower angle of view · Faster · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (419g vs 134g) · Much larger (92.2mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE
TTArtisan AF 56mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Narrower angle of view · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.45m) · Much heavier (235g vs 134g) · Slightly larger (67mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Tokina atx-m 56mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2021 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (315g vs 134g) · Larger (72mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 56mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2020) · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (290g vs 134g) · Larger (72mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 56mm F/1.7 ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Narrower angle of view · Slightly faster · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.45m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:9.09 vs 1:7.14) · Heavier (171g vs 134g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DA DSM Pro • ⌀58		2023 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:7.14) · Much heavier (387g vs 134g) · Much larger (85mm vs 58mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE