Yongnuo 33mm F/1.4 DA DSM WL

Standard prime lens • Digital era

Announced:
· April 2024
Production status:
● In production
Country of design:
· PRC (People's Republic of China)
Original name:
· No data
Class:
· Ultra-fast APS-C-format standard prime lens
· Professional model

Abbreviations

DA	The lens is designed for APS-C digital mirrorless cameras.
DSM	The lens is equipped with Digital Stepping Motor.
WL	The lens supports wireless remote control.

Specification

Optical design:
Maximum format:	APS-C
Focal length:	33mm
Speed:	F/1.4
Lens construction:	11 elements in 9 groups
Lens construction:	2 ULD, 4 HR
Mount:	Nikon Z
Mount:	Sony E
Diagonal angle of view:	46.4° (Nikon Z APS-C)
Diagonal angle of view:	46.4° (Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C)
On Nikon Z APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	50.5mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/2.1 (in terms of depth of field)
On Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	50.5mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/2.1 (in terms of depth of field)
Diaphragm mechanism:
Diaphragm type:	Automatic
Aperture control:	Aperture ring (Manual settings + Auto Exposure setting)
Number of blades:	9 (nine)
Focusing:
Closest focusing distance:	0.40m
Magnification ratio:	1:10
Focusing modes:	Autofocus (AF), Manual focus (MF)
Autofocus motor:	Stepping motor
Manual focus control:	Focusing ring
Focus mode selector:	AF - MF
Manual focus override in autofocus mode:	Determined by the camera
Optical Image Stabilizer (OIS):
Built-in OIS:	-
Physical characteristics:
Weight:	370g (mount not specified)
Maximum diameter x Length:	⌀69×87mm (mount not specified)
Weather sealing:	Water-resistant mount
Fluorine coating:	Yes
Accessories:
Filters:	Screw-type 58mm
Lens hood:	LH-69 T - Bayonet-type petal-shaped
Teleconverters:	Not available

Source of data

Manufacturer's technical data.

From the editor

A professional standard lens with a moderately complex optical formula, which contains many special elements, and an ultra-fast speed of F/1.4. The professional features of the lens include a physical aperture ring with Auto-Exposure setting, CLICK ON/OFF switch, a function button, and support for wireless remote control that works at a distance of up to 30m. With the latter, you can control the focus, start and stop video recording, and more. There is another switch on the lens barrel, SW, which, depending on your preference, can function as a focus mode switch or a wireless remote control switch. The DSM stepping motor is responsible for smooth, fast and quiet autofocus. There is a USB Type C connector at the rear of the lens, which can be used to update the lens firmware. For a lens with a speed of F/1.4, the Yongnuo 33mm is not too heavy or large, and all that is missing to be completely happy is weather sealing.

Lenses with similar focal length

■Nikon Z mount (7)
Meike AF 35mm F/2 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.40m) · Slightly lighter (300g vs 370g) · No fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 35mm F/1.8 S • ⌀62		2018 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.25m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.26 vs 1:10) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 35mm F/1.4 • ⌀62	Pro	2024 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Full frame · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.56 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Slightly heavier (415g vs 370g) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 35mm F/1.2 S • ⌀82	Pro	2025 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5 vs 1:10) · Much heavier (1060g vs 370g) · Much larger (150mm vs 87mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (82mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 32mm F/2.8 • ⌀27		2022 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.40m) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (196g vs 370g) · Much smaller (50mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (27mm vs 58mm) · Built-in telescopic lens hood NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 35mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · No focus mode selector · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 35mm F/2 DF DSM • ⌀52		2020 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:10) · Lighter (290g vs 370g) · Slightly smaller (73mm vs 87mm) · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Nikon Z mount (8) · APS-C
Meike AF 33mm F/1.4 STM Neo • ⌀55	Pro	2024 ●	compare	0	0
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly lighter (314g vs 370g) · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2016 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2016) · Slightly wider angle of view · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Lighter (285g vs 370g) · Slightly smaller (75.3mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 33mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly faster · Does not have aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · No focus mode selector · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating HIDE
TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED II • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Does not have aperture ring · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (176g vs 370g) · Much smaller (49mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2023 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Discontinued · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Does not have aperture ring · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.40m) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (199g vs 370g) · Smaller (60mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 33mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · No focus mode selector · Slightly lighter (310g vs 370g) · Slightly smaller (73mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 35mm F/1.7 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.33m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (180g vs 370g) · Smaller (56.4mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Yongnuo 35mm F/1.8 DA DSM WL • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:10) · Much lighter (182g vs 370g) · Smaller (64mm vs 87mm) · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Sony E mount (19)
Meike AF 35mm F/2 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.40m) · Slightly lighter (298g vs 370g) · No fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/2.8 FE • ⌀49 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/2.8 FE		2017 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2017) · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:8.33 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (85.6g vs 370g) · Much smaller (33mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.4 FE • ⌀67 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/1.4 FE	Pro	2017 ●	compare	0	4
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2017) · Full frame · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:10) · Linear super sonic motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (645g vs 370g) · Larger (115mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.8 FE • ⌀58 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/1.8 FE		2020 ●	compare	4	0
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.29m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (210g vs 370g) · Smaller (63.5mm vs 87mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.4 FE II • ⌀67 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/1.4 FE II	Pro	2022 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.29m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.56 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (659g vs 370g) · Larger (115mm vs 87mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang Remaster Slim 32mm F/2.8 • ⌀49 • Pancake lens		2024 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Much slower · Simpler optical design · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.37m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:9.09 vs 1:10) · Much lighter (66.5g vs 370g) · Much smaller (19.5mm vs 87mm) · Pancake lens · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.4 P FE • ⌀67	Pro	2024 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Heavier (470g vs 370g) · Slightly larger (99.2mm vs 87mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/1.2 DG DN \| A • ⌀82	Pro	2019 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Slightly faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.1 vs 1:10) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (1080g vs 370g) · Much larger (138.2mm vs 87mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (82mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/2 DG [DN] \| C • ⌀58		2020 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.7 vs 1:10) · Slightly lighter (325g vs 370g) · Smaller (67.4mm vs 87mm) · No fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/1.4 DG DN \| A • ⌀67	Pro	2021 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.4 vs 1:10) · Much heavier (640g vs 370g) · Larger (111.5mm vs 87mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/1.4 DG HSM \| A • ⌀67	Pro	2018 ●	compare	1	5
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 5 · Older model (2018) · Discontinued · Full frame · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.2 vs 1:10) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (755g vs 370g) · Larger (118mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 35mm F/2.8 ZA [SEL35F28Z] • ⌀49		2013 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2013) · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:8.33 vs 1:10) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (120g vs 370g) · Much smaller (37mm vs 87mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE ZEISS Distagon T* 35mm F/1.4 ZA [SEL35F14Z] • ⌀72	Pro	2015 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2015) · Full frame · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.56 vs 1:10) · Direct Drive Super Sonic Wave Motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (630g vs 370g) · Larger (112mm vs 87mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (72mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE 35mm F/1.8 [SEL35F18F] • ⌀55		2019 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.22m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:4.17 vs 1:10) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Lighter (280g vs 370g) · Slightly smaller (73mm vs 87mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE 35mm F/1.4 GM [SEL35F14GM] • ⌀67	Pro	2021 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:4.35 vs 1:10) · XD Linear Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (524g vs 370g) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron 35mm F/2.8 Di III OSD F053 • ⌀67		2019 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.15m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:2 vs 1:10) · Optimized Silent Drive · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (210g vs 370g) · Smaller (64mm vs 87mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 35mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Discontinued · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · No focus mode selector · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Viltrox LAB AF 35mm F/1.2 ASPH ED IF VCM • ⌀77	Pro	2025 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.34m vs 0.40m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:10) · Hyper Voice Coil Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (920g vs 370g) · Much larger (121.8mm vs 87mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (77mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Yongnuo 35mm F/2 DF DSM • ⌀52		2020 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:10) · Lighter (295g vs 370g) · Slightly smaller (72mm vs 87mm) · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Sony E mount (12) · APS-C
Meike AF 33mm F/1.4 STM Neo • ⌀55	Pro	2024 ●	compare	0	0
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly lighter (314g vs 370g) · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/2.8 EX DN • ⌀46		2012 ●	compare	3	3
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2012) · Discontinued · Slightly wider angle of view · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:8.1 vs 1:10) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (132g vs 370g) · Much smaller (40mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/2.8 DN \| A • ⌀46		2013 ●	compare	3	3
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2013) · Discontinued · Slightly wider angle of view · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:8.1 vs 1:10) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (140g vs 370g) · Much smaller (40.5mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2016 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2016) · Slightly wider angle of view · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Lighter (265g vs 370g) · Slightly smaller (73.3mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 33mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly faster · Does not have aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · No focus mode selector · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating HIDE
Sony E 35mm F/1.8 OSS [SEL35F18] • ⌀49		2012 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2012) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:10) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Has image stabilizer · Much lighter (155g vs 370g) · Much smaller (45mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED II • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Does not have aperture ring · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (176g vs 370g) · Much smaller (49mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2023 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Discontinued · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Does not have aperture ring · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.40m) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (199g vs 370g) · Smaller (60mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina atx-m 33mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · No focus mode selector · Lighter (285g vs 370g) · Slightly smaller (72mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 33mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · No focus mode selector · Lighter (270g vs 370g) · Slightly smaller (72mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 35mm F/1.7 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.33m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (170g vs 370g) · Smaller (54.3mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Carl Zeiss Touit Planar T* 32mm F/1.8 • E52		2013 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2013) · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly slower · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.37m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:9 vs 1:10) · Micromotor · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (200g vs 370g) · Smaller (60mm vs 87mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE