Yongnuo 23mm F/1.4 DA DSM WL

Wide-angle prime lens • Digital era

Announced:
· August 2024
Production status:
● In production
Country of design:
· PRC (People's Republic of China)
Original name:
· No data
Class:
· Ultra-fast APS-C-format wide-angle prime lens
· Professional model

Abbreviations

DA	The lens is designed for APS-C digital mirrorless cameras.
DSM	The lens is equipped with Digital Stepping Motor.
WL	The lens supports wireless remote control.

Specification

Optical design:
Maximum format:	APS-C
Focal length:	23mm
Speed:	F/1.4
Lens construction:	11 elements in 9 groups
Lens construction:	3 ULD, 4 HR
Mount:	Fujifilm X
	Nikon Z
	Sony E
Diagonal angle of view:	63.5° (Fujifilm X APS-C)
	63.1° (Nikon Z APS-C)
	63.1° (Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C)
On Fujifilm X APS-C [1.52x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	35mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/2.1 (in terms of depth of field)
On Nikon Z APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	35.2mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/2.1 (in terms of depth of field)
On Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	35.2mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/2.1 (in terms of depth of field)
Diaphragm mechanism:
Diaphragm type:	Automatic
Aperture control:	Aperture ring (Manual settings + Auto Exposure setting)
Number of blades:	9 (nine)
Focusing:
Closest focusing distance:	0.30m
Magnification ratio:	1:10
Focusing modes:	Autofocus (AF), Manual focus (MF)
Autofocus motor:	Stepping motor
Manual focus control:	Focusing ring
Focus mode selector:	AF - MF
Manual focus override in autofocus mode:	Determined by the camera
Optical Image Stabilizer (OIS):
Built-in OIS:	-
Physical characteristics:
Weight:	360g (mount not specified)
Maximum diameter x Length:	⌀69×85mm (mount not specified)
Weather sealing:	Water-resistant mount
Fluorine coating:	Yes
Accessories:
Filters:	Screw-type 58mm
Lens hood:	LH-68 T - Bayonet-type petal-shaped
Teleconverters:	Not available

Source of data

Manufacturer's technical data.

From the editor

A professional moderate wide-angle lens with a moderately complex optical formula, which contains many special elements, and an ultra-fast speed of F/1.4. The professional features of the lens include a physical aperture ring with Auto-Exposure setting, CLICK ON/OFF switch, a function button, and support for wireless remote control that works at a distance of up to 30m. With the latter, you can control the focus, start and stop video recording, and more. There is another switch on the lens barrel, SW, which, depending on your preference, can function as a focus mode switch or a wireless remote control switch. The DSM stepping motor is responsible for smooth, fast and quiet autofocus. There is a USB Type C connector at the rear of the lens, which can be used to update the lens firmware. For a lens with a speed of F/1.4, the Yongnuo 23mm is not too heavy or large, and all that is missing to be completely happy is weather sealing.

Lenses with similar focal length

■Fujifilm X mount (10) · APS-C
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 23mm F/1.4 Aspherical R • ⌀62	Pro	2013 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2013) · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.30m) · Micromotor · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Slightly lighter (300g vs 360g) · Smaller (63mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 23mm F/2 Aspherical R WR • ⌀43		2016 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2016) · Slower · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.22m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (180g vs 360g) · Smaller (51.9mm vs 85mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (43mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 23mm F/1.4 Aspherical R LM WR • ⌀58	Pro	2021 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2021) · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.19m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:5 vs 1:10) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 23mm F/2 Aspherical R WR Graphite Edition • ⌀43		2017 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2017) · Discontinued · Slower · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.22m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (180g vs 360g) · Smaller (51.9mm vs 85mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (43mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 23mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2023 ●	compare	0	0
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 0 · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.25m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.3 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 23mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly faster · Does not have aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · No focus mode selector · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating HIDE
TTArtisan AF 23mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2025 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly slower · Does not have aperture ring · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (210g vs 360g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Tokina atx-m 23mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · No focus mode selector · Lighter (276g vs 360g) · Slightly smaller (72mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 23mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · No focus mode selector · Lighter (260g vs 360g) · Slightly smaller (72mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 25mm F/1.7 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2025 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly larger magnification (1:9.09 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (170g vs 360g) · Smaller (56.4mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Nikon Z mount (5)
Nikon Nikkor Z 24mm F/1.8 S • ⌀72		2019 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.25m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:10) · Heavier (450g vs 360g) · Slightly larger (96.5mm vs 85mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (72mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 20mm F/1.8 S • ⌀77	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.20m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:5.26 vs 1:10) · Much heavier (505g vs 360g) · Larger (108.5mm vs 85mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (77mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 26mm F/2.8 • Pancake lens		2023 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.20m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:5.26 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (125g vs 360g) · Much smaller (23.5mm vs 85mm) · Pancake lens · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · No filter thread NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 20mm F/2.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2023 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.19m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (173g vs 360g) · Smaller (60.8mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 24mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · No focus mode selector · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) HIDE

■Nikon Z mount (5) · APS-C
Nikon DX Nikkor Z 24mm F/1.7 • ⌀46		2023 ●	compare	5	0
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.18m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:5.26 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (135g vs 360g) · Much smaller (40mm vs 85mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 23mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly faster · Does not have aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · No focus mode selector · Slightly larger (94.2mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 23mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2025 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly slower · Does not have aperture ring · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (210g vs 360g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Viltrox AF 23mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · No focus mode selector · Slightly lighter (300g vs 360g) · Slightly smaller (73mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 25mm F/1.7 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2025 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly larger magnification (1:9.09 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (180g vs 360g) · Smaller (56.4mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Sony E mount (19)
Samyang AF 24mm F/2.8 FE • ⌀49 akaRokinon AF 24mm F/2.8 FE		2018 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.24m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:10) · Linear super sonic motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (93g vs 360g) · Much smaller (37mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang AF 24mm F/1.8 FE • ⌀58 akaRokinon AF 24mm F/1.8 FE		2021 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.19m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:4.76 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Lighter (230g vs 360g) · Slightly smaller (71.5mm vs 85mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang Remaster Slim 21mm F/3.5 • ⌀49 • Pancake lens	Pro	2024 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.18m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:6.25 vs 1:10) · Much lighter (70.7g vs 360g) · Much smaller (19.5mm vs 85mm) · Pancake lens · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 24mm F/3.5 DG [DN] \| C • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.108m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:2 vs 1:10) · Lighter (230g vs 360g) · Much smaller (50.8mm vs 85mm) · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 24mm F/2 DG [DN] \| C • ⌀62		2021 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.245m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.7 vs 1:10) · Slightly smaller (74mm vs 85mm) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 20mm F/2 DG [DN] \| C • ⌀62	Pro	2022 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.22m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.7 vs 1:10) · Slightly smaller (74.4mm vs 85mm) · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 20mm F/1.4 DG DN \| A • ⌀82	Pro	2022 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.23m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:6.1 vs 1:10) · Much heavier (630g vs 360g) · Larger (113.2mm vs 85mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (82mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 24mm F/1.4 DG DN \| A • ⌀72	Pro	2022 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.25m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.1 vs 1:10) · Much heavier (510g vs 360g) · Slightly larger (97.5mm vs 85mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (72mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 20mm F/1.4 DG HSM \| A	Pro	2018 ●	compare	0	4
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.276m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.1 vs 1:10) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (1015g vs 360g) · Much larger (155.8mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · No filter thread · Built-in lens hood NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 24mm F/1.4 DG HSM \| A • ⌀77	Pro	2018 ●	compare	0	4
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.25m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:5.3 vs 1:10) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (740g vs 360g) · Larger (116.2mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (77mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE 24mm F/1.4 GM [SEL24F14GM] • ⌀67	Pro	2018 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.24m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:10) · Direct Drive Super Sonic Wave Motor instead of Stepping motor · Heavier (445g vs 360g) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE 20mm F/1.8 G [SEL20F18G] • ⌀67	Pro	2020 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.19m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:5 vs 1:10) · XD Linear Motor instead of Stepping motor · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sony FE 24mm F/2.8 G [SEL24F28G] • ⌀49		2021 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.24m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:10) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Much lighter (162g vs 360g) · Much smaller (45mm vs 85mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III OSD F050 • ⌀67	Pro	2019 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.11m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:2 vs 1:10) · Optimized Silent Drive · No focus mode selector · Lighter (220g vs 360g) · Smaller (64mm vs 85mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD F051 • ⌀67		2019 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.12m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:2 vs 1:10) · Optimized Silent Drive · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (215g vs 360g) · Smaller (64mm vs 85mm) · Weather-sealed lens barrel · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina FiRIN 20mm F/2 FE • ⌀62	Pro	2018 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.30m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10.29 vs 1:10) · Ring-type Ultrasonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Heavier (464g vs 360g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 20mm F/2.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2023 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.19m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (157g vs 360g) · Smaller (59.5mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 24mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · No focus mode selector · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) HIDE
ZEISS Batis Distagon T* 25mm F/2 • E67		2015 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2015) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.20m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:5.2 vs 1:10) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Weather-sealed lens barrel · No fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) HIDE

■Sony E mount (8) · APS-C
Sigma 23mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2023 ●	compare	0	0
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 0 · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.25m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.3 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 23mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly faster · Does not have aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · No focus mode selector · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating HIDE
Sony E Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 24mm F/1.8 ZA [SEL24F18Z] • ⌀49		2011 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2011) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.16m vs 0.30m) · Larger magnification (1:4 vs 1:10) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Lighter (225g vs 360g) · Smaller (66mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony E 20mm F/2.8 [SEL20F28] • ⌀49 • Pancake lens		2013 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2013) · Slightly wider angle of view · Much slower · Simpler optical design · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.20m vs 0.30m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:8.33 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (69g vs 360g) · Much smaller (20.4mm vs 85mm) · Pancake lens · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 23mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2025 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly slower · Does not have aperture ring · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (210g vs 360g) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Tokina atx-m 23mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · No focus mode selector · Lighter (276g vs 360g) · Slightly smaller (72mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · No fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 23mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · No focus mode selector · Lighter (260g vs 360g) · Slightly smaller (72mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 25mm F/1.7 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2025 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Does not have aperture ring · Slightly larger magnification (1:9.09 vs 1:10) · No focus mode selector · Much lighter (170g vs 360g) · Smaller (56.4mm vs 85mm) · Lens mount is not weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE