TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED II

Standard prime lens • Digital era

Announced:
· December 2024
Production status:
● In production
Country of design:
· PRC (People's Republic of China)
Original name:
· TTARTISAN AF 35/1.8 ED
Class:
· Fast APS-C-format standard prime lens

Abbreviations

ED	The lens incorporates low dispersion elements.
II	Second generation.

Model history (2)

■TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED		A	10 - 8	0.60m	⌀52	2023 ●
■TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED II		A	10 - 7	0.40m	⌀52	2024 ●

Specification

Optical design:
Maximum format:	APS-C
Focal length:	35mm
Speed:	F/1.8
Lens construction:	10 elements in 7 groups
Lens construction:	2 ED, 2 HRI
Mount:	Fujifilm X
	Nikon Z
	Sony E
Diagonal angle of view:	44.2° (Fujifilm X APS-C)
	44° (Nikon Z APS-C)
	44° (Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C)
On Fujifilm X APS-C [1.52x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	53.2mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/2.7 (in terms of depth of field)
On Nikon Z APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	53.6mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/2.8 (in terms of depth of field)
On Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	53.6mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/2.8 (in terms of depth of field)
Diaphragm mechanism:
Diaphragm type:	Automatic
Aperture control:	None; the aperture is controlled from the camera
Number of blades:	9 (nine)
Focusing:
Closest focusing distance:	0.40m
Magnification ratio:	<No data>
Focusing modes:	Autofocus (AF), Manual focus (MF)
Autofocus motor:	Stepping motor (Lead screw-type)
Manual focus control:	Focusing ring
Focus mode selector:	None; focusing mode is set from the camera
Manual focus override in autofocus mode:	Determined by the camera
Optical Image Stabilizer (OIS):
Built-in OIS:	-
Physical characteristics:
Weight:	176g (Fujifilm X)
Maximum diameter x Length:	⌀60×49mm (Fujifilm X)
Weather sealing:	-
Fluorine coating:	-
Accessories:
Filters:	Screw-type 52mm
Lens hood:	Bayonet-type petal-shaped
Teleconverters:	<No data>

Source of data

Manufacturer's technical data.

From the editor

An improved version of the AF 35/1.8 ED lens with the following changes:

new optical formula with an additional ED element;
the closest focusing distance has been reduced from 0.6 to 0.4m;
the length of the lens has been reduced by 11mm;
instead of a strange rectangular lens hood, a traditional petal-shaped lens hood is used.

Lenses with similar focal length

■Fujifilm X mount (13) · APS-C
7Artisans AF 35mm F/1.4 • ⌀62	Pro	2025 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly faster · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.40m) · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (62mm vs 52mm) HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 35mm F/1.4 Aspherical R • ⌀52	Pro	2012 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2012) · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.80m vs 0.40m) · Micromotor · Slightly larger (55mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 35mm F/2 Aspherical R WR • ⌀43		2015 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2015) · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.40m) · Weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (43mm vs 52mm) HIDE
Fujifilm Fujinon XC 35mm F/2 Aspherical • ⌀43		2020 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.40m) · Lighter (130g vs 176g) · Smaller filter size (43mm vs 52mm) · Lens hood is not available HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 33mm F/1.4 Aspherical R LM WR • ⌀58	Pro	2021 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2021) · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (360g vs 176g) · Much larger (73.5mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) HIDE
Meike AF 33mm F/1.4 STM Neo • ⌀55	Pro	2024 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (314g vs 176g) · Much larger (82mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (55mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2016 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2016) · Wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Much heavier (275g vs 176g) · Much larger (73.6mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 33mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider angle of view · Faster · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Much heavier (398g vs 176g) · Much larger (92.2mm vs 49mm) · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) HIDE
TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2023 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Discontinued · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.40m) · Slightly heavier (199g vs 176g) · Larger (60mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina atx-m 33mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · Much heavier (285g vs 176g) · Much larger (72mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 33mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · Much heavier (270g vs 176g) · Much larger (72mm vs 49mm) · Fluorine coating HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 35mm F/1.7 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	1	0
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.33m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger (56.4mm vs 49mm) · Fluorine coating HIDE
Carl Zeiss Touit Planar T* 32mm F/1.8 • E52		2013 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2013) · Slightly wider angle of view · Has aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.37m vs 0.40m) · Micromotor · Slightly heavier (210g vs 176g) · Slightly larger (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE

■Nikon Z mount (10)
Meike AF 35mm F/2 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Slightly slower · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.40m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (300g vs 176g) · Much larger (93mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 35mm F/1.8 S • ⌀62		2018 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.25m vs 0.40m) · Has focus mode selector (A - M) · Much heavier (370g vs 176g) · Much larger (86mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (62mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 40mm F/2 • ⌀52		2021 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.29m vs 0.40m) · Weather-sealed · Lens hood is not available HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 40mm F/2 SE • ⌀52		2022 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.29m vs 0.40m) · Weather-sealed · Lens hood is not available HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 35mm F/1.4 • ⌀62	Pro	2024 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.40m) · Much heavier (415g vs 176g) · Much larger (86.5mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (62mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 35mm F/1.2 S • ⌀82	Pro	2025 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Has focus mode selector (A - M) · Much heavier (1060g vs 176g) · Much larger (150mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (82mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 32mm F/2.8 • ⌀27		2022 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.40m) · Slightly heavier (196g vs 176g) · Smaller filter size (27mm vs 52mm) · Built-in telescopic lens hood NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 40mm F/2.5 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.34m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger (55.9mm vs 49mm) · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 35mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Much heavier (370g vs 176g) · Much larger (89.9mm vs 49mm) · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (55mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Yongnuo 35mm F/2 DF DSM • ⌀52		2020 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.40m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (290g vs 176g) · Much larger (73mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Nikon Z mount (8) · APS-C
Meike AF 33mm F/1.4 STM Neo • ⌀55	Pro	2024 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (314g vs 176g) · Much larger (84mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (55mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2016 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2016) · Wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Much heavier (285g vs 176g) · Much larger (75.3mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 33mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider angle of view · Faster · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Much heavier (404g vs 176g) · Much larger (94.2mm vs 49mm) · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2023 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Discontinued · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.40m) · Slightly heavier (199g vs 176g) · Larger (60mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 33mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · Much heavier (310g vs 176g) · Much larger (73mm vs 49mm) · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 35mm F/1.7 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	1	0
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.33m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger (56.4mm vs 49mm) · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Yongnuo 33mm F/1.4 DA DSM WL • ⌀58	Pro	2024 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (370g vs 176g) · Much larger (87mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Yongnuo 35mm F/1.8 DA DSM WL • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Larger (64mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Sony E mount (23)
Meike AF 35mm F/2 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Slightly slower · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.40m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (298g vs 176g) · Much larger (91mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/2.8 FE • ⌀49 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/2.8 FE		2017 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2017) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.40m) · Much lighter (85.6g vs 176g) · Smaller (33mm vs 49mm) · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.4 FE • ⌀67 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/1.4 FE	Pro	2017 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2017) · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Linear super sonic motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (645g vs 176g) · Much larger (115mm vs 49mm) · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.8 FE • ⌀58 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/1.8 FE		2020 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.29m vs 0.40m) · Slightly heavier (210g vs 176g) · Larger (63.5mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.4 FE II • ⌀67 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/1.4 FE II	Pro	2022 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.29m vs 0.40m) · Much heavier (659g vs 176g) · Much larger (115mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang Remaster Slim 32mm F/2.8 • ⌀49 • Pancake lens		2024 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.37m vs 0.40m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much lighter (66.5g vs 176g) · Much smaller (19.5mm vs 49mm) · Pancake lens · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.4 P FE • ⌀67	Pro	2024 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Much heavier (470g vs 176g) · Much larger (99.2mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/1.2 DG DN \| A • ⌀82	Pro	2019 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (1080g vs 176g) · Much larger (138.2mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (82mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/2 DG [DN] \| C • ⌀58		2020 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.40m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (325g vs 176g) · Larger (67.4mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/1.4 DG DN \| A • ⌀67	Pro	2021 ●	compare	3	3
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Slightly faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (640g vs 176g) · Much larger (111.5mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/1.4 DG HSM \| A • ⌀67	Pro	2018 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2018) · Discontinued · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (755g vs 176g) · Much larger (118mm vs 49mm) · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 40mm F/1.4 DG HSM \| A • ⌀82	Pro	2018 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Slightly faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MO - MF) · Much heavier (1260g vs 176g) · Much larger (157mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (82mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 35mm F/2.8 ZA [SEL35F28Z] • ⌀49		2013 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2013) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.40m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Lighter (120g vs 176g) · Smaller (37mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE ZEISS Distagon T* 35mm F/1.4 ZA [SEL35F14Z] • ⌀72	Pro	2015 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2015) · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Direct Drive Super Sonic Wave Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (630g vs 176g) · Much larger (112mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (72mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE 35mm F/1.8 [SEL35F18F] • ⌀55		2019 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.22m vs 0.40m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (280g vs 176g) · Much larger (73mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (55mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE 35mm F/1.4 GM [SEL35F14GM] • ⌀67	Pro	2021 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.40m) · XD Linear Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (524g vs 176g) · Much larger (95mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE 40mm F/2.5 G [SEL40F25G] • ⌀49		2021 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.40m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 52mm) HIDE
Tamron 35mm F/2.8 Di III OSD F053 • ⌀67		2019 ●	compare	3	4
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.15m vs 0.40m) · Optimized Silent Drive · Slightly heavier (210g vs 176g) · Larger (64mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 40mm F/2.5 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.34m vs 0.40m) · Larger (59.5mm vs 49mm) · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 35mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2020) · Discontinued · Full frame · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Much heavier (340g vs 176g) · Much larger (88.2mm vs 49mm) · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (55mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox LAB AF 35mm F/1.2 ASPH ED IF VCM • ⌀77	Pro	2025 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.34m vs 0.40m) · Hyper Voice Coil Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (920g vs 176g) · Much larger (121.8mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (77mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Yongnuo 35mm F/2 DF DSM • ⌀52		2020 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.40m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (295g vs 176g) · Much larger (72mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
ZEISS Batis Distagon T* 40mm F/2 CF • E67		2018 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.24m vs 0.40m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Focusing distance range limiter · Much heavier (361g vs 176g) · Much larger (93mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Sony E mount (12) · APS-C
Meike AF 33mm F/1.4 STM Neo • ⌀55	Pro	2024 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (314g vs 176g) · Much larger (82mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (55mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/2.8 EX DN • ⌀46		2012 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2012) · Discontinued · Wider angle of view · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Lighter (132g vs 176g) · Slightly smaller (40mm vs 49mm) · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/2.8 DN \| A • ⌀46		2013 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2013) · Discontinued · Wider angle of view · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Lighter (140g vs 176g) · Slightly smaller (40.5mm vs 49mm) · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2016 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2016) · Wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Much heavier (265g vs 176g) · Much larger (73.3mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 33mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider angle of view · Faster · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 9) · Much heavier (400g vs 176g) · Much larger (92.5mm vs 49mm) · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony E 35mm F/1.8 OSS [SEL35F18] • ⌀49		2012 ●	compare	0	0
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2012) · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 9) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.40m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Has image stabilizer · Slightly lighter (155g vs 176g) · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2023 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Discontinued · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.40m) · Slightly heavier (199g vs 176g) · Larger (60mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina atx-m 33mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · Much heavier (285g vs 176g) · Much larger (72mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox AF 33mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · Much heavier (270g vs 176g) · Much larger (72mm vs 49mm) · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 35mm F/1.7 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	1	0
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.33m vs 0.40m) · Slightly larger (54.3mm vs 49mm) · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Yongnuo 33mm F/1.4 DA DSM WL • ⌀58	Pro	2024 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Has aperture ring · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (370g vs 176g) · Much larger (87mm vs 49mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Carl Zeiss Touit Planar T* 32mm F/1.8 • E52		2013 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2013) · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.37m vs 0.40m) · Micromotor · Slightly heavier (200g vs 176g) · Larger (60mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE