Sirui Sniper AF 56mm F/1.2

Short telephoto prime lens • Digital era

Announced:
· November 2023
Production status:
● In production
Country of design:
· PRC (People's Republic of China)
Original name:
· SIRUI 56mm F1.2 APS-C AF
Class:
· Ultra-fast APS-C-format short telephoto prime lens
· Professional model

Specification

Optical design:
Maximum format:	APS-C
Focal length:	56mm
Speed:	F/1.2
Lens construction:	12 elements in 11 groups
Lens construction:	1 ED, 4 HRI
Mount:	Fujifilm X
	Nikon Z
	Sony E
Diagonal angle of view:	28.5° (Fujifilm X APS-C)
	28.3° (Nikon Z APS-C)
	28.3° (Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C)
On Fujifilm X APS-C [1.52x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	85.1mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/1.8 (in terms of depth of field)
On Nikon Z APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	85.7mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/1.8 (in terms of depth of field)
On Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	85.7mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/1.8 (in terms of depth of field)
Diaphragm mechanism:
Diaphragm type:	Automatic
Aperture control:	None; the aperture is controlled from the camera
Number of blades:	11 (eleven)
Focusing:
Closest focusing distance:	0.60m
Magnification ratio:	<No data>
Focusing modes:	Autofocus (AF), Manual focus (MF)
Autofocus motor:	Unknown type
Manual focus control:	Focusing ring
Focus mode selector:	None; focusing mode is set from the camera
Manual focus override in autofocus mode:	Determined by the camera
Optical Image Stabilizer (OIS):
Built-in OIS:	-
Physical characteristics:
Weight:	419g (Fujifilm X)
	427g (Nikon Z)
	422g (Sony E)
Maximum diameter x Length:	⌀?×92.2mm (Fujifilm X)
	⌀?×94.2mm (Nikon Z)
	⌀?×92.5mm (Sony E)
Weather sealing:	-
Fluorine coating:	-
Accessories:
Filters:	Screw-type 58mm
Lens hood:	Bayonet-type round
Teleconverters:	Not available

Source of data

Manufacturer's technical data.

From the editor

For manufacturer description, please refer to the page dedicated to the SIRUI AF 33/1.2 lens.

Lenses with similar focal length

■Nikon Z mount (9)
7Artisans AF 50mm F/1.8 • ⌀62		2024 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Meike AF 50mm F/1.8 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.63m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Slightly lighter (382g vs 427g) · Weather-sealed lens mount NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Meike AF 55mm F/1.8 Pro STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Slightly lighter (364g vs 427g) · Weather-sealed lens mount NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 50mm F/1.8 S • ⌀62		2018 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (A - M) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 50mm F/1.2 S • ⌀82	Pro	2020 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (A - M) · Much heavier (1090g vs 427g) · Much larger (150mm vs 94.2mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (82mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Nikon Nikkor Z 50mm F/1.4 • ⌀62	Pro	2024 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.37m vs 0.60m) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 50mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Discontinued · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.60m) · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 50mm F/2 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀58		2025 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.51m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (220g vs 427g) · Smaller (58.6mm vs 94.2mm) · Fluorine coating HIDE
Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DF DSM • ⌀58		2021 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Weather-sealed lens mount HIDE

■Nikon Z mount (9) · APS-C
Brightin Star AF 50mm F/1.4 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Wider angle of view · Slightly slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Slightly smaller (79mm vs 94.2mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Meike AF 55mm F/1.4 STM • ⌀52	Pro	2024 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly slower · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.61m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Lighter (286g vs 427g) · Slightly smaller (76mm vs 94.2mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
SG-Image AF 55mm F/1.8 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly wider angle of view · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly lighter (365g vs 427g) · Slightly smaller (78mm vs 94.2mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 56mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀55	Pro	2018 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2018) · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Lighter (295g vs 427g) · Smaller (61.5mm vs 94.2mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) HIDE
TTArtisan AF 56mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (250g vs 427g) · Smaller (69mm vs 94.2mm) · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 56mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	4	0
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2020) · Slightly slower · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Lighter (320g vs 427g) · Smaller (73mm vs 94.2mm) · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 56mm F/1.7 ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (187g vs 427g) · Much smaller (55.9mm vs 94.2mm) · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 56mm F/1.4 DA DSM WL • ⌀58	Pro	2024 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Slightly lighter (375g vs 427g) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Fluorine coating HIDE
Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DA DSM [II] • ⌀49		2023 ●	compare	6	1
Advantages: 6 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider angle of view · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (148g vs 427g) · Smaller (58mm vs 94.2mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) HIDE

■Sony E mount (19)
7Artisans AF 50mm F/1.8 • ⌀62		2024 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Meike AF 50mm F/1.8 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.63m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Slightly larger (103.2mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Meike AF 55mm F/1.8 Pro STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Slightly lighter (364g vs 422g) · Weather-sealed lens mount NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Samyang AF 50mm F/1.4 FE • ⌀67 akaRokinon AF 50mm F/1.4 FE	Pro	2016 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2016) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Heavier (585g vs 422g) · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Samyang AF 50mm F/1.4 FE II • ⌀72 akaRokinon AF 50mm F/1.4 FE II	Pro	2021 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.60m) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (72mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sigma 50mm F/1.4 DG HSM \| A • ⌀77	Pro	2018 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (880g vs 422g) · Larger (125.9mm vs 92.5mm) · Larger filter size (77mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sigma 50mm F/1.4 DG DN \| A • ⌀72	Pro	2023 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (660g vs 422g) · Larger (111.5mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (72mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sigma 50mm F/2 DG [DN] \| C • ⌀58		2023 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Slightly lighter (345g vs 422g) · Smaller (70mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount HIDE
Sigma 50mm F/1.2 DG DN \| A • ⌀72	Pro	2024 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (13 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (740g vs 422g) · Slightly larger (110.8mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (72mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sony FE Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 55mm F/1.8 ZA [SEL55F18Z] • ⌀49		2013 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2013) · Full frame · Slower · Simpler optical design · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Lighter (281g vs 422g) · Smaller (71mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sony FE 50mm F/1.8 [SEL50F18F] • ⌀49		2016 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2016) · Full frame · Slower · Simpler optical design · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (186g vs 422g) · Smaller (59.5mm vs 92.5mm) · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sony FE ZEISS Planar T* 50mm F/1.4 ZA SSM [SEL50F14Z] • ⌀72	Pro	2016 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2016) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (778g vs 422g) · Slightly larger (108mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (72mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sony FE 50mm F/1.2 GM [SEL50F12GM] • ⌀72	Pro	2021 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Has aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (778g vs 422g) · Slightly larger (108mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (72mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sony FE 50mm F/2.5 G [SEL50F25G] • ⌀49		2021 ●	compare	6	1
Advantages: 6 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Much slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much lighter (174g vs 422g) · Much smaller (45mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sony FE 50mm F/1.4 GM [SEL50F14GM] • ⌀67	Pro	2023 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Has aperture ring · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.41m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Heavier (516g vs 422g) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 50mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Discontinued · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.60m) · Slightly lighter (350g vs 422g) · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 50mm F/2 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀58		2025 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.51m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (205g vs 422g) · Smaller (56.5mm vs 92.5mm) · Fluorine coating HIDE
Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DF DSM • ⌀58		2021 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Weather-sealed lens mount HIDE
SongRaw Moonlit 50mm F/1.2 • ⌀72	Pro	2025 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (13 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.52m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (900g vs 422g) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (72mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE

■Sony E mount (13) · APS-C
Brightin Star AF 50mm F/1.4 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Wider angle of view · Slightly slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Slightly smaller (79mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Meike AF 55mm F/1.4 STM • ⌀52	Pro	2024 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly slower · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.61m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Lighter (286g vs 422g) · Slightly smaller (76mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
SG-Image AF 55mm F/1.8 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly wider angle of view · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly lighter (365g vs 422g) · Slightly smaller (78mm vs 92.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 60mm F/2.8 DN \| A • ⌀46		2013 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2013) · Discontinued · Narrower angle of view · Much slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (185g vs 422g) · Much smaller (55.5mm vs 92.5mm) · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sigma 56mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀55	Pro	2018 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2018) · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Lighter (280g vs 422g) · Smaller (59.5mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Sony E 50mm F/1.8 OSS [SEL50F18] • ⌀49		2011 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2011) · Wider angle of view · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.38m vs 0.60m) · Has image stabilizer · Much lighter (202g vs 422g) · Smaller (62mm vs 92.5mm) · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) HIDE
TTArtisan AF 56mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (233g vs 422g) · Smaller (67mm vs 92.5mm) · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Tokina atx-m 56mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2021 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly slower · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Lighter (315g vs 422g) · Smaller (72mm vs 92.5mm) · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 56mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	4	0
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2020) · Slightly slower · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Lighter (290g vs 422g) · Smaller (72mm vs 92.5mm) · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 56mm F/1.7 ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (170g vs 422g) · Much smaller (54.3mm vs 92.5mm) · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 56mm F/1.4 DA DSM WL • ⌀58	Pro	2024 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Slightly lighter (375g vs 422g) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DA DSM [II] • ⌀49		2023 ●	compare	6	1
Advantages: 6 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider angle of view · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (134g vs 422g) · Smaller (58mm vs 92.5mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DA DSM • ⌀49		2020 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Wider angle of view · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (146g vs 422g) · Smaller (58mm vs 92.5mm) · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) HIDE

■Fujifilm X mount (1)
Meike AF 55mm F/1.8 Pro STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Slower · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Slightly lighter (364g vs 419g) · Weather-sealed lens mount NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE

■Fujifilm X mount (15) · APS-C
Brightin Star AF 50mm F/1.4 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Wider angle of view · Slightly slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Slightly smaller (79mm vs 92.2mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 56mm F/1.2 Aspherical R • ⌀62	Pro	2014 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2014) · Discontinued · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 11) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.70m vs 0.60m) · Smaller (69.7mm vs 92.2mm) · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 56mm F/1.2 Aspherical R APD • ⌀62	Pro	2014 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2014) · Aspherical design · Optimized for more impressive and pleasing bokeh than conventional portrait lenses · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 11) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.70m vs 0.60m) · Smaller (69.7mm vs 92.2mm) · Larger filter size (62mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 50mm F/2 Aspherical R WR • ⌀46		2017 ●	compare	6	1
Advantages: 6 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2017) · Wider angle of view · Slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.39m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (200g vs 419g) · Smaller (59.4mm vs 92.2mm) · Weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 50mm F/1 Aspherical R WR • ⌀77	Pro	2020 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Wider angle of view · Slightly faster · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.70m vs 0.60m) · Much heavier (845g vs 419g) · Slightly larger (103.5mm vs 92.2mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (77mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 56mm F/1.2 Aspherical R WR • ⌀67	Pro	2022 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Slightly smaller (76mm vs 92.2mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Meike AF 55mm F/1.4 STM • ⌀52	Pro	2024 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly wider angle of view · Slightly slower · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.61m vs 0.60m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Lighter (286g vs 419g) · Slightly smaller (76mm vs 92.2mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
SG-Image AF 55mm F/1.8 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly wider angle of view · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly lighter (365g vs 419g) · Slightly smaller (78mm vs 92.2mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 56mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀55	Pro	2018 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2018) · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Lighter (280g vs 419g) · Smaller (59.8mm vs 92.2mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 58mm) HIDE
TTArtisan AF 56mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.50m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (235g vs 419g) · Smaller (67mm vs 92.2mm) · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Tokina atx-m 56mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2021 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly slower · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Lighter (315g vs 419g) · Smaller (72mm vs 92.2mm) · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 56mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	4	0
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2020) · Slightly slower · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Lighter (290g vs 419g) · Smaller (72mm vs 92.2mm) · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 56mm F/1.7 ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.55m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (171g vs 419g) · Much smaller (54.7mm vs 92.2mm) · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (52mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DA DSM [II] • ⌀49		2023 ●	compare	6	1
Advantages: 6 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider angle of view · Slower · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) · Much lighter (134g vs 419g) · Smaller (58mm vs 92.2mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 58mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 50mm F/1.8 DA DSM Pro • ⌀58		2023 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider angle of view · Slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · Less diaphragm blades (9 vs 11) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.60m) HIDE