Samyang Remaster Slim 32mm F/2.8

Wide-angle prime lens • Digital era

Announced:
· August 2024
Production status:
● In production
Country of design:
· ROK (Republic of Korea)
Original name:
· SAMYANG Remaster Slim RS32/2.8
Class:
· Fast full-frame wide-angle prime lens
· Pancake lens

Specification

Optical design:
Maximum format:	35mm full frame
Focal length:	32mm
Speed:	F/2.8
Lens construction:	6 elements in 6 groups
Lens construction:	2 ASPH, 1 HR
Mount:	Sony E
Diagonal angle of view:	68.1° (35mm full frame)
On Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	49mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/4.3 (in terms of depth of field)
Diagonal angle of view:	47.7°
Diaphragm mechanism:
Diaphragm type:	Automatic
Aperture control:	None; the aperture is controlled from the camera
Number of blades:	7 (seven)
Focusing:
Closest focusing distance:	0.37m
Magnification ratio:	1:9.09
Focusing modes:	Autofocus (AF), Manual focus (MF)
Autofocus motor:	Stepping motor
Manual focus control:	Focusing ring
Focus mode selector:	AF - MF
Manual focus override in autofocus mode:	Determined by the camera
Optical Image Stabilizer (OIS):
Built-in OIS:	-
Physical characteristics:
Weight:	66.5g
Maximum diameter x Length:	⌀63×19.5mm
Weather sealing:	-
Fluorine coating:	-
Accessories:
Filters:	Screw-type 49mm
Lens hood:	<No data>
Teleconverters:	Not available

Source of data

Manufacturer's technical data.

From the editor

In MF mode, the closest focusing distance is 0.28m and the magnification ratio is 1:6.67.

Weight of the RS 32/2.8 optical system: 8.4g.

For manufacturer description, please refer to the page dedicated to the RS 21/3.5 lens.

For specification of the Sony E-mount focusing module, please refer to the page dedicated to the RS AF Module FE.

Lenses with similar focal length

■Sony E mount (23)
Meike AF 35mm F/2 STM • ⌀58		2024 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Faster · More complex optical design · Pure spherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.45m vs 0.37m) · Much heavier (298g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (91mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/2.8 FE • ⌀49 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/2.8 FE		2017 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2017) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.37m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:8.33 vs 1:9.09) · No focus mode selector · Heavier (85.6g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (33mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.4 FE • ⌀67 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/1.4 FE	Pro	2017 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2017) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:9.09) · Linear super sonic motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (645g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (115mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Larger filter size (67mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.8 FE • ⌀58 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/1.8 FE		2020 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2020) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Faster · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.29m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:9.09) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (210g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (63.5mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.4 FE II • ⌀67 akaRokinon AF 35mm F/1.4 FE II	Pro	2022 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.29m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:5.56 vs 1:9.09) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (659g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (115mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (67mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Samyang Remaster Slim 28mm F/3.5 • ⌀49 • Pancake lens		2024 ●	compare	0	0
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 0 · Wider angle of view · Slightly slower · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.37m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:8.33 vs 1:9.09) HIDE
Samyang AF 35mm F/1.4 P FE • ⌀67	Pro	2024 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:9.09) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (470g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (99.2mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (67mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/1.2 DG DN \| A • ⌀82	Pro	2019 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2019) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:5.1 vs 1:9.09) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (1080g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (138.2mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (82mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/2 DG [DN] \| C • ⌀58		2020 ●	compare	3	3
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2020) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Faster · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:5.7 vs 1:9.09) · Much heavier (325g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (67.4mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/1.4 DG DN \| A • ⌀67	Pro	2021 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2021) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:5.4 vs 1:9.09) · Much heavier (640g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (111.5mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 28mm F/1.4 DG HSM \| A • ⌀77	Pro	2019 ●	compare	3	3
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2019) · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:5.4 vs 1:9.09) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (925g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (133.7mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (77mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 35mm F/1.4 DG HSM \| A • ⌀67	Pro	2018 ●	compare	2	4
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2018) · Discontinued · Slightly narrower angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Floating element system · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:5.2 vs 1:9.09) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (755g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (118mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Larger filter size (67mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony FE Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 35mm F/2.8 ZA [SEL35F28Z] • ⌀49		2013 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2013) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.37m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:8.33 vs 1:9.09) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (120g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (37mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed HIDE
Sony FE 28mm F/2 [SEL28F20] • ⌀49		2015 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2015) · Wider angle of view · Faster · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.29m vs 0.37m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:9.09) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (200g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (60mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed HIDE
Sony FE ZEISS Distagon T* 35mm F/1.4 ZA [SEL35F14Z] • ⌀72	Pro	2015 ●	compare	3	3
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2015) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:5.56 vs 1:9.09) · Direct Drive Super Sonic Wave Motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (630g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (112mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (72mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sony FE 35mm F/1.8 [SEL35F18F] • ⌀55		2019 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2019) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Faster · More complex optical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.22m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:4.17 vs 1:9.09) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (280g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (73mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (55mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sony FE 35mm F/1.4 GM [SEL35F14GM] • ⌀67	Pro	2021 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2021) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:4.35 vs 1:9.09) · XD Linear Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (524g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (95mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Tamron 35mm F/2.8 Di III OSD F053 • ⌀67		2019 ●	compare	3	4
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2019) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.15m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:2 vs 1:9.09) · Optimized Silent Drive · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (210g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (64mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 35mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	3	3
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2020) · Discontinued · Slightly narrower angle of view · Faster · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.37m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:9.09) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (340g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (88.2mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (55mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 28mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2023 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Wider angle of view · Faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:9.09) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (367g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (88.2mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (55mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 28mm F/4.5 ASPH ED VCM • Pancake lens		2024 ●	compare	2	3
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 3 · Wider angle of view · Slower · Fixed diaphragm · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.32m vs 0.37m) · Voice Coil Motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Smaller (15.3mm vs 19.5mm) · Fluorine coating · No filter thread · Lens hood is not available HIDE
Viltrox LAB AF 35mm F/1.2 ASPH ED IF VCM • ⌀77	Pro	2025 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · Slightly narrower angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.34m vs 0.37m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:9.09) · Hyper Voice Coil Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (920g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (121.8mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (77mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 35mm F/2 DF DSM • ⌀52		2020 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Faster · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.37m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:9.09) · Much heavier (295g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (72mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE

■Sony E mount (13) · APS-C
Meike AF 33mm F/1.4 STM Neo • ⌀55	Pro	2024 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · APS-C · Much faster · More complex optical design · Pure spherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.37m) · Much heavier (314g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (82mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (55mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/2.8 EX DN • ⌀46		2012 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2012) · Discontinued · APS-C · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.37m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:8.1 vs 1:9.09) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (132g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (40mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/2.8 DN \| A • ⌀46		2013 ●	compare	0	3
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2013) · Discontinued · APS-C · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.37m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:8.1 vs 1:9.09) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (140g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (40.5mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2016 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2016) · APS-C · Much faster · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.37m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7 vs 1:9.09) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (265g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (73.3mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 33mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · APS-C · Much faster · More complex optical design · Pure spherical design · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.37m) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (400g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (92.5mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Sony E 35mm F/1.8 OSS [SEL35F18] • ⌀49		2012 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2012) · APS-C · Faster · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.37m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:9.09) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · No focus mode selector · Has image stabilizer · Much heavier (155g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (45mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens HIDE
TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED II • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	1	2
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 2 · APS-C · Faster · Pure spherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.37m) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (176g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (49mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 35mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2023 ●	compare	1	4
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 4 · Discontinued · APS-C · Faster · Pure spherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.37m) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (199g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (60mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina atx-m 33mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · APS-C · Much faster · Pure spherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.37m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:9.09) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (285g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (72mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox AF 33mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2020) · APS-C · Much faster · Pure spherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.37m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:9.09) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (270g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (72mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 35mm F/1.7 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · APS-C · Faster · More complex optical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.33m vs 0.37m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:9.09) · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (170g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (54.3mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE
Yongnuo 33mm F/1.4 DA DSM WL • ⌀58	Pro	2024 ●	compare	4	3
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 3 · APS-C · Much faster · More complex optical design · Pure spherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.37m) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:10 vs 1:9.09) · Much heavier (370g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (87mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Weather-sealed lens mount · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 49mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Carl Zeiss Touit Planar T* 32mm F/1.8 • E52		2013 ●	compare	1	3
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2013) · APS-C · Faster · Pure spherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 7) · Slightly larger magnification (1:9 vs 1:9.09) · Micromotor · No focus mode selector · Much heavier (200g vs 66.5g) · Much larger (60mm vs 19.5mm) · Not a pancake lens · Larger filter size (52mm vs 49mm) HIDE