Jintu AF 27mm F/2.8

Wide-angle prime lens • Digital era

Announced:
· 2024
Production status:
● In production
Country of design:
· PRC (People's Republic of China)
Original name:
· 27/2.8
Class:
· Fast APS-C-format wide-angle prime lens

Specification

Optical design:
Maximum format:	APS-C
Focal length:	27mm
Speed:	F/2.8
Lens construction:	6 elements in 5 groups (Double Gauss derivative)
Lens construction:	2 HRI
Mount:	Fujifilm X
Mount:	Sony E
Diagonal angle of view:	55.6° (Fujifilm X APS-C)
Diagonal angle of view:	55.3° (Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C)
On Fujifilm X APS-C [1.52x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	41mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/4.3 (in terms of depth of field)
On Sony NEX/a/ZV APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length:	41.3mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed:	F/4.3 (in terms of depth of field)
Diaphragm mechanism:
Diaphragm type:	Automatic
Aperture control:	None; the aperture is controlled from the camera
Number of blades:	6 (six)
Focusing:
Closest focusing distance:	0.30m
Magnification ratio:	<No data>
Focusing modes:	Autofocus (AF), Manual focus (MF)
Autofocus motor:	Stepping motor (Lead screw-type)
Manual focus control:	Focusing ring
Focus mode selector:	None; focusing mode is set from the camera
Manual focus override in autofocus mode:	Determined by the camera
Optical Image Stabilizer (OIS):
Built-in OIS:	-
Physical characteristics:
Weight:	181g (mount not specified)
Maximum diameter x Length:	<No data>
Weather sealing:	-
Fluorine coating:	-
Accessories:
Filters:	Screw-type 52mm
Lens hood:	Not available
Teleconverters:	Not available

Source of data

Manufacturer's technical data.

From the editor

Most likely a cosmetically reworked 7Artisans AF 27/2.8.

Lenses with similar focal length

■Fujifilm X mount (1)
Viltrox AF 28mm F/4.5 ASPH ED VCM • Pancake lens		2024 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Fixed diaphragm · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.32m vs 0.30m) · Voice Coil Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much lighter (60g vs 181g) · Pancake lens · Fluorine coating · No filter thread NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE

■Fujifilm X mount (17) · APS-C
7Artisans AF 27mm F/2.8		2024 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Lighter (144g vs 181g) · No filter thread NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 27mm F/2.8 Aspherical • ⌀39 • Pancake lens		2013 ●	compare	3	3
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 3 · Older model (2013) · Discontinued · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.30m) · Micromotor · Much lighter (78g vs 181g) · Pancake lens · Smaller filter size (39mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 23mm F/1.4 Aspherical R • ⌀62	Pro	2013 ●	compare	3	4
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 4 · Older model (2013) · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.30m) · Micromotor · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (300g vs 181g) · Larger filter size (62mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 23mm F/2 Aspherical R WR • ⌀43		2016 ●	compare	5	0
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2016) · Wider angle of view · Faster · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.22m vs 0.30m) · Weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (43mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 27mm F/2.8 Aspherical R WR • ⌀39 • Pancake lens		2021 ●	compare	6	2
Advantages: 6 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2021) · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Larger closest focusing distance (0.60m vs 0.30m) · Micromotor · Much lighter (84g vs 181g) · Pancake lens · Weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (39mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 23mm F/1.4 Aspherical R LM WR • ⌀58	Pro	2021 ●	compare	5	1
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2021) · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.19m vs 0.30m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (375g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Fujifilm Super EBC Fujinon XF 23mm F/2 Aspherical R WR Graphite Edition • ⌀43		2017 ●	compare	5	1
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2017) · Discontinued · Wider angle of view · Faster · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.22m vs 0.30m) · Weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (43mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2016 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2016) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Much faster · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Much heavier (275g vs 181g) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sigma 23mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2023 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.25m vs 0.30m) · Much heavier (335g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 23mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 6) · Much heavier (380g vs 181g) · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 27mm F/2.8 • ⌀39		2022 ●	compare	4	0
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 0 · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.30m) · Much lighter (93g vs 181g) · Smaller filter size (39mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 23mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2025 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Wider angle of view · Faster · More complex optical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly heavier (210g vs 181g) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Tokina atx-m 23mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Much heavier (276g vs 181g) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Viltrox AF 23mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Much heavier (260g vs 181g) · Fluorine coating · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Viltrox AF 27mm F/1.2 ASPH ED IF STM Pro • ⌀67	Pro	2023 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Much faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.30m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (560g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 25mm F/1.7 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2025 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly wider angle of view · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Fluorine coating · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Yongnuo 23mm F/1.4 DA DSM WL • ⌀58	Pro	2024 ●	compare	5	1
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (360g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE

■Sony E mount (16)
Samyang AF 24mm F/2.8 FE • ⌀49 akaRokinon AF 24mm F/2.8 FE		2018 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.24m vs 0.30m) · Linear super sonic motor instead of Stepping motor · Much lighter (93g vs 181g) · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Samyang AF 24mm F/1.8 FE • ⌀58 akaRokinon AF 24mm F/1.8 FE		2021 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.19m vs 0.30m) · Heavier (230g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Samyang Remaster Slim 28mm F/3.5 • ⌀49 • Pancake lens		2024 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much lighter (70.6g vs 181g) · Pancake lens · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sigma 24mm F/3.5 DG [DN] \| C • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Slightly slower · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.108m vs 0.30m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Heavier (230g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (55mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sigma 24mm F/2 DG [DN] \| C • ⌀62		2021 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.245m vs 0.30m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (360g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (62mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sigma 24mm F/1.4 DG DN \| A • ⌀72	Pro	2022 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Much faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.25m vs 0.30m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (510g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (72mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sigma 24mm F/1.4 DG HSM \| A • ⌀77	Pro	2018 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Much faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.25m vs 0.30m) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (740g vs 181g) · Larger filter size (77mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sigma 28mm F/1.4 DG HSM \| A • ⌀77	Pro	2019 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Much faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.30m) · Hyper Sonic Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MO - MF) · Much heavier (925g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (77mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sony FE 28mm F/2 [SEL28F20] • ⌀49		2015 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2015) · Full frame · Faster · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.29m vs 0.30m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Slightly heavier (200g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sony FE 24mm F/1.4 GM [SEL24F14GM] • ⌀67	Pro	2018 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2018) · Full frame · Much faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.24m vs 0.30m) · Direct Drive Super Sonic Wave Motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (445g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sony FE 24mm F/2.8 G [SEL24F28G] • ⌀49		2021 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Older model (2021) · Full frame · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.24m vs 0.30m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Slightly lighter (162g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD F051 • ⌀67		2019 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2019) · Full frame · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.12m vs 0.30m) · Optimized Silent Drive · Slightly heavier (215g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Viltrox AF 24mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2020 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Full frame · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Much heavier (340g vs 181g) · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (55mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Viltrox AF 28mm F/1.8 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀55		2023 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Full frame · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.37m vs 0.30m) · Much heavier (367g vs 181g) · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (55mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Viltrox AF 28mm F/4.5 ASPH ED VCM • Pancake lens		2024 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Full frame · Slower · Aspherical design · Fixed diaphragm · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.32m vs 0.30m) · Voice Coil Motor instead of Stepping motor · Much lighter (60g vs 181g) · Pancake lens · Fluorine coating · No filter thread NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
ZEISS Batis Distagon T* 25mm F/2 • E67		2015 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Older model (2015) · Full frame · Faster · Aspherical design · Floating element system · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.20m vs 0.30m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Much heavier (335g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE

■Sony E mount (16) · APS-C
7Artisans AF 27mm F/2.8		2024 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · No filter thread NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/2.8 EX DN • ⌀46		2012 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2012) · Discontinued · Slightly narrower angle of view · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Lighter (132g vs 181g) · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 52mm) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/2.8 DN \| A • ⌀46		2013 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2013) · Discontinued · Slightly narrower angle of view · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Lighter (140g vs 181g) · Smaller filter size (46mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sigma 30mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2016 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2016) · Slightly narrower angle of view · Much faster · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Much heavier (265g vs 181g) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sigma 23mm F/1.4 DC DN \| C • ⌀52	Pro	2023 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.25m vs 0.30m) · Much heavier (330g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sirui Sniper AF 23mm F/1.2 • ⌀58	Pro	2023 ●	compare	2	1
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 6) · Much heavier (381g vs 181g) · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Sony E Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 24mm F/1.8 ZA [SEL24F18Z] • ⌀49		2011 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2011) · Slightly wider angle of view · Faster · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.16m vs 0.30m) · Linear motor instead of Stepping motor · Heavier (225g vs 181g) · Smaller filter size (49mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 27mm F/2.8 • ⌀39		2022 ●	compare	4	0
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 0 · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (7 vs 6) · Slightly larger closest focusing distance (0.35m vs 0.30m) · Much lighter (90g vs 181g) · Smaller filter size (39mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
TTArtisan AF 23mm F/1.8 ED • ⌀52		2025 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Wider angle of view · Faster · More complex optical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Slightly heavier (210g vs 181g) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Tokina atx-m 23mm F/1.4 E / X • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	3	1
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Much heavier (276g vs 181g) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Viltrox AF 23mm F/1.4 ED IF STM • ⌀52	Pro	2020 ●	compare	4	1
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 1 · Older model (2020) · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Much heavier (260g vs 181g) · Fluorine coating · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Viltrox AF 27mm F/1.2 ASPH ED IF STM Pro • ⌀67	Pro	2023 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Much faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (11 vs 6) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.30m) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (565g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (67mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Viltrox Air AF 25mm F/1.7 ASPH ED IF STM • ⌀52		2025 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly wider angle of view · Faster · More complex optical design · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Fluorine coating · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Yongnuo 23mm F/1.4 DA DSM WL • ⌀58	Pro	2024 ●	compare	5	1
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider angle of view · Much faster · More complex optical design · Has aperture ring · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 6) · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Much heavier (360g vs 181g) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (58mm vs 52mm) · Detachable lens hood NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE
Ulanzi AF 27mm F/2.8 • ⌀52		2024 ●	compare	0	0
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 0 In terms of specification, there are no significant differences between these lenses. HIDE
Neewer AF 27mm F/2.8 • ⌀52		●	compare	0	0
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly lighter (158g vs 181g) NOTE: Not enough data to compare lens weight or lens length for this mount. HIDE