Cosina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC

akaPhoenix AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5

akaPromaster Spectrum 7 AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC

akaSoligor AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC

akaVivitar Series 1 AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC

akaVoigtlander Ultragon AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 VMC

Wide-angle zoom lens • Film era • Discontinued

Cosina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC:

Phoenix AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5:

Promaster Spectrum 7 AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC:

Soligor AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC:

Vivitar Series 1 AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC:

Voigtlander Ultragon AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 VMC:

Announced:
· No data
Production status:
● Discontinued
Country of design:
· Japan
Original name:
· COSINA 19-35 MM 1:3.5-4.5 MC
Class:
· Slow full-frame wide-angle zoom lens

Abbreviations

MC	Multi-layer anti-reflection coating is applied to the surfaces of lens elements. This anti-reflection coating increases light transmission, eliminates flare and ghosting, and maintains color consistence among all lens models.

Sample photos uploaded by users (64)

35mm F/6.3

19mm F/8

19mm F/5.6

19mm F/6.3

19mm F/11

19mm F/8

35mm F/9

19mm F/9

19mm F/13

19mm F/8

19mm F/4.5

20mm F/6.3

19mm F/9

19mm F/7.1

35mm F/7.1

35mm F/6.3

29mm F/6.3

19mm F/6.3

19mm F/8

19mm F/6.3

35mm F/13

19mm F/6.3

19mm F/8

26mm F/5.6

19mm F/5.6

19mm F/8

19mm F/3.5

19mm F/4

19mm F/7.1

25mm F/4.5

35mm F/7.1

19mm F/9

35mm F/4.5

29mm F/4

19mm F/9

19mm F/7.1

35mm F/5

19mm F/4.5

19mm F/7.1

19mm F/10

19mm F/6.3

19mm F/9

19mm F/7.1

19mm F/8

22mm F/9

19mm F/11

19mm F/4.5

19mm F/4

19mm F/8

19mm F/10

19mm F/8

35mm F/10

35mm F/5.6

19mm F/8

27mm F/4

19mm F/3.5

19mm F/8

Model history (3)

■Cosina 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC akaKalimar 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC akaPhoenix 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 akaPromaster Spectrum 7 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC akaSoligor 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC akaVivitar Series 1 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 Multicoated	A	13 - 11	0.50m	⌀77	●
■Cosina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC akaPhoenix AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 akaPromaster Spectrum 7 AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC akaSoligor AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC akaVivitar Series 1 AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC akaVoigtlander Ultragon AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 VMC	A	13 - 11	0.50m	⌀77	●
■Cosina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC Digital	A	13 - 11	0.50m	⌀77	2004 ●

Specification

Optical design:
Maximum format:	35mm full frame
Focal length range:	19mm - 35mm [1.8X zoom ratio]
Speed range:	F/3.5 @ 19mm - F/4.5 @ 35mm
Lens construction:	13 elements in 11 groups
Mount and Flange focal distance:	Canon EF [44mm]
	Minolta/Sony A [44.5mm]
	Nikon F [46.5mm]
	Pentax K [45.5mm]
Diagonal angle of view:	97.4° @ 19mm - 63.4° @ 35mm (35mm full frame)
On Canon EOS APS-C [1.59x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length range:	30.2mm - 55.7mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed range:	F/5.6 @ 19mm - F/7.2 @ 35mm (in terms of depth of field)
Diagonal angle of view:	71.2° @ 19mm - 42.5° @ 35mm
On Sony DSLR-A/SLT-A APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length range:	29.1mm - 53.6mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed range:	F/5.4 @ 19mm - F/6.9 @ 35mm (in terms of depth of field)
Diagonal angle of view:	73.3° @ 19mm - 44° @ 35mm
On Nikon D APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length range:	29.1mm - 53.6mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed range:	F/5.4 @ 19mm - F/6.9 @ 35mm (in terms of depth of field)
Diagonal angle of view:	73.3° @ 19mm - 44° @ 35mm
On Pentax K APS-C [1.53x] cameras:
35mm equivalent focal length range:	29.1mm - 53.6mm (in terms of field of view)
35mm equivalent speed range:	F/5.4 @ 19mm - F/6.9 @ 35mm (in terms of depth of field)
Diagonal angle of view:	73.3° @ 19mm - 44° @ 35mm
Diaphragm mechanism:
Diaphragm type:	Automatic
Aperture control:	None; the aperture is controlled from the camera (Canon EF, Minolta/Sony A)
Aperture control:	Aperture ring (Manual settings + Auto Exposure setting) (Nikon F, Pentax K)
Number of blades:	8 (eight)
Zooming:
Zoom mechanism:	Manual
Zoom control:	Zoom ring
Zoom type:	Rotary
Zooming method:	Extends while zooming
Focusing:
Closest focusing distance:	0.50m
Magnification ratio:	1:12 @ 35mm
Focusing modes:	Autofocus (AF), Manual focus (M)
Autofocus motor:	Micromotor (Canon EF)
Autofocus motor:	In-camera motor (Nikon F, Pentax K, Minolta/Sony A)
Manual focus control:	Focusing ring
Focus mode selector:	AF - M (Canon EF)
Focus mode selector:	None; focusing mode is set from the camera (Nikon F, Pentax K, Minolta/Sony A)
Manual focus override in autofocus mode:	-
Optical Image Stabilizer (OIS):
Built-in OIS:	-
Physical characteristics:
Weight:	300g (mount not specified)
Maximum diameter x Length:	⌀82×69.5mm (mount not specified)
Accessories:
Filters:	Screw-type 77mm
Lens hood:	Bayonet-type round
Teleconverters:	<No data>

Source of data

Manufacturer's technical data.

Manufacturer description #1

With an aperture range of f/3.5-22 and a minimum focusing distance of 50cm, this compact and lightweight lens is the perfect wide angle partner to any SLR camera. Available in all popular SLR camera mounts. Filter size is 77mm.

Manufacturer description #2

Compact and lightweight, this lens covers ultra-wide 19mm to wide 35mm focal lengths. Series 1 superior aspherical optics improve contrast and resolution from edge to edge throughout the zoom range. Multicoated for reduced flare and increased light transmission.

Manufacturer description #3

A perfect, inexpensive choice for the user that needs the versatility of a wide angle zoom. Ideal for use at sporting events, family outings, or on vacations. A bayonet mount lens hood is included.

From the editor

The following lenses share the same optical design developed by Cosina:

COSINA 19-35 MM 1:3.5-4.5 MC
PHOENIX 19-35mm 1:3.5-4.5 AF ZOOM
PROMASTER SPECTRUM 7 19-35MM 1:3.5-4.5 MC
MC SOLIGOR AF ZOOM 19-35 MM 1:3.5-4.5
Vivitar Series 1 19-35mm 1:3.5-4.5 MC AUTO FOCUS ZOOM
VOIGTLÄNDER ULTRAGON 19-35MM 1:3.5-4.5 VMC

We listed only the most common lenses with this optical design, but there may be others. Most (if not all) of these were most likely produced by Cosina as an ODM (Original Design Manufacturer).

Notes

The autofocus will not be available with Nikon D40, D40X, D60, D3000-D3500, D5000-D5600 digital SLR cameras.

Lenses with similar focal length range

■Canon EF mount (25)
Canon EF 16-35mm F/2.8L II USM • ⌀82	Pro	2007 ●	compare	10	2
Advantages: 10 Disadvantages: 2 · Wider focal range · Wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 16mm · Faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.55 vs 1:12) · Ring-type Ultrasonic Motor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (635g vs 300g) · Much larger (112mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Canon EF 16-35mm F/2.8L USM • ⌀77	Pro	2001 ●	compare	10	2
Advantages: 10 Disadvantages: 2 · Wider focal range · Wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 16mm · Faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.55 vs 1:12) · Ring-type Ultrasonic Motor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (600g vs 300g) · Much larger (103mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Canon EF 17-40mm F/4L USM • ⌀77	Pro	2003 ●	compare	8	2
Advantages: 8 Disadvantages: 2 · Wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly longer reach at the longer end · Internal zooming · Constant F/4 speed across the focal length range · Slightly slower @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 40mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.17 vs 1:12) · Ring-type Ultrasonic Motor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (500g vs 300g) · Larger (97mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Canon EF 20-35mm F/3.5-4.5 USM • ⌀77		1993 ●	compare	4	0
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Less diaphragm blades (5 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.34m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:7.7 vs 1:12) · Ring-type Ultrasonic Motor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Slightly heavier (340g vs 300g) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Canon EF 20-35mm F/2.8L • ⌀72	Pro	1989 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly larger magnification (1:11.11 vs 1:12) · Arc-Form Drive instead of Micromotor · Much heavier (570g vs 300g) · Larger (89mm vs 69.5mm) · Smaller filter size (72mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Canon EF 17-35mm F/2.8L USM • ⌀77	Pro	1996 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.42m vs 0.50m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:9.1 vs 1:12) · Ring-type Ultrasonic Motor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (545g vs 300g) · Larger (95.7mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Canon EF 16-35mm F/4L IS USM • ⌀77	Pro	2014 ●	compare	11	2
Advantages: 11 Disadvantages: 2 · In production · Wider focal range · Wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/4 speed across the focal length range · Slightly slower @ 16mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.35 vs 1:12) · Ring-type Ultrasonic Motor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Has image stabilizer · Much heavier (615g vs 300g) · Much larger (112.8mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Canon EF 16-35mm F/2.8L III USM • ⌀82	Pro	2016 ●	compare	12	2
Advantages: 12 Disadvantages: 2 · In production · Wider focal range · Wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 16mm · Faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4 vs 1:12) · Ring-type Ultrasonic Motor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (790g vs 300g) · Much larger (127.5mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Cosina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC Digital • ⌀77		2004 ●	compare	1	0
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 0 · Optimized for digital cameras HIDE
Sigma 17-35mm F/2.8-4 EX DG [HSM] • ⌀77	Pro	2003 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.5 vs 1:12) · Hyper Sonic Motor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (560g vs 300g) · Larger (86.2mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 20-40mm F/2.8 EX DG Aspherical IF • ⌀82	Pro	2001 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Wider focal range · Slightly longer reach at the longer end · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Faster @ 40mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.6 vs 1:12) · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (595g vs 300g) · Much larger (107.8mm vs 69.5mm) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 18-35mm F/3.5-4.5 Aspherical ZEN • ⌀82 akaQuantaray Tech-10 AF 18-35mm F/3.5-4.5		1994 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) HIDE
Sigma 21-35mm F/3.5-4.2 ZEN • ⌀77		1988 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Floating element system · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:12.5 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (480g vs 300g) · Much larger (104.5mm vs 69.5mm) · Built-in lens hood NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 17-35mm F/2.8-4 EX Aspherical [HSM] • ⌀82	Pro	1999 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · Slightly larger magnification (1:11.5 vs 1:12) · Hyper Sonic Motor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Heavier (400g vs 300g) · Larger (86mm vs 69.5mm) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron SP AF 17-35mm F/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical [IF] A05 • ⌀77	Pro	2003 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:5.4 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (440g vs 300g) · Larger (86.5mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron SP AF 20-40mm F/2.7-3.5 Aspherical [IF] 166D • ⌀77		1994 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider focal range · Slightly longer reach at the longer end · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Slightly faster @ 40mm · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly larger magnification (1:10.2 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (525g vs 300g) · Slightly larger (81mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron SP AF 20-40mm F/2.7-3.5 Aspherical [IF] 266D • ⌀77		2000 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider focal range · Slightly longer reach at the longer end · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Slightly faster @ 40mm · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly larger magnification (1:10.2 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (525g vs 300g) · Slightly larger (81mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 A10 • ⌀77		2002 ●	compare	0	0
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 0 In terms of specification, there are no significant differences between these lenses. HIDE
Tamron 17-35mm F/2.8-4 Di OSD A037 • ⌀77	Pro	2018 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.9 vs 1:12) · Optimized Silent Drive instead of Micromotor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (460g vs 300g) · Larger (92.5mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 • ⌀77 akaQuantaray AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5		2000 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Internal zooming · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:9.28 vs 1:12) · Heavier (400g vs 300g) · Slightly larger (77mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AT-X Pro AF 20-35mm F/2.8 • ⌀77	Pro	1998 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Slightly larger magnification (1:11.6 vs 1:12) · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (585g vs 300g) · Larger (85.5mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AT-X Pro AF SD 17-35mm F/4 [IF] • ⌀82	Pro	2011 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/4 speed across the focal length range · Slightly slower @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.82 vs 1:12) · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (600g vs 300g) · Larger (94.5mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AF 20-35mm F/3.5-4.5 II • ⌀77		1996 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Much heavier (500g vs 300g) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AF 20-35mm F/3.5-4.5 • ⌀72		1990 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Much heavier (460g vs 300g) · Smaller filter size (72mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina atx-i 17-35mm F/4 FF • ⌀82	Pro	2020 ●	compare	6	2
Advantages: 6 Disadvantages: 2 · In production · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/4 speed across the focal length range · Slightly slower @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.82 vs 1:12) · Silent Drive Module instead of Micromotor · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (609g vs 300g) · Larger (97mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Canon EF mount (1) · APS-C
Sigma 18-35mm F/1.8 DC HSM \| A • ⌀72		2013 ●	compare	9	2
Advantages: 9 Disadvantages: 2 · In production · APS-C · Internal zooming · Constant F/1.8 speed across the focal length range · Much faster @ 18mm · Much faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.3 vs 1:12) · Hyper Sonic Motor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (810g vs 300g) · Much larger (121mm vs 69.5mm) · Smaller filter size (72mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Minolta/Sony A mount (19)
Cosina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC Digital • ⌀77		2004 ●	compare	1	0
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 0 · Optimized for digital cameras HIDE
Konica Minolta AF 17-35mm F/2.8-4 D • ⌀77	Pro	2004 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:5.4 vs 1:12) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (430g vs 300g) · Larger (88mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Minolta AF 17-35mm F/3.5 G • ⌀77	Pro	1997 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/3.5 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:5.88 vs 1:12) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (600g vs 300g) · Larger (90.5mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Minolta AF 20-35mm F/3.5-4.5 • ⌀72		1998 ●	compare	1	0
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Slightly smaller magnification (1:12.5 vs 1:12) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Smaller filter size (72mm vs 77mm) HIDE
Sigma 17-35mm F/2.8-4 EX DG [HSM] • ⌀77	Pro	2003 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.5 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (560g vs 300g) · Larger (86.2mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 20-40mm F/2.8 EX DG Aspherical IF • ⌀82	Pro	2001 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Wider focal range · Slightly longer reach at the longer end · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Faster @ 40mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.6 vs 1:12) · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (595g vs 300g) · Much larger (107.8mm vs 69.5mm) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 18-35mm F/3.5-4.5 Aspherical ZEN • ⌀82 akaQuantaray Tech-10 AF 18-35mm F/3.5-4.5		1994 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) HIDE
Sigma 21-35mm F/3.5-4.2 ZEN • ⌀77		1988 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Floating element system · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:12.5 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (480g vs 300g) · Much larger (104.5mm vs 69.5mm) · Built-in lens hood NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 17-35mm F/2.8-4 EX Aspherical [HSM] • ⌀82	Pro	1999 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · Slightly larger magnification (1:11.5 vs 1:12) · Heavier (400g vs 300g) · Larger (83.5mm vs 69.5mm) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 16-35mm F/2.8 ZA SSM [SAL1635Z] • ⌀77	Pro	2008 ●	compare	9	2
Advantages: 9 Disadvantages: 2 · Wider focal range · Wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 16mm · Faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:3.57 vs 1:12) · Super Sonic Wave Motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (863g vs 300g) · Much larger (114mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sony ZEISS Vario-Sonnar T* 16-35mm F/2.8 ZA SSM II [SAL1635Z2] • ⌀77	Pro	2015 ●	compare	10	2
Advantages: 10 Disadvantages: 2 · Wider focal range · Wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 16mm · Faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.17 vs 1:12) · Super Sonic Wave Motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (872g vs 300g) · Much larger (114mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron SP AF 17-35mm F/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical [IF] A05 • ⌀77	Pro	2003 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:5.4 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (440g vs 300g) · Larger (86.5mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron SP AF 20-40mm F/2.7-3.5 Aspherical [IF] 166D • ⌀77		1994 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider focal range · Slightly longer reach at the longer end · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Slightly faster @ 40mm · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly larger magnification (1:10.2 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (525g vs 300g) · Slightly larger (81mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron SP AF 20-40mm F/2.7-3.5 Aspherical [IF] 266D • ⌀77		2000 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider focal range · Slightly longer reach at the longer end · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Slightly faster @ 40mm · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly larger magnification (1:10.2 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (525g vs 300g) · Slightly larger (81mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 A10 • ⌀77		2002 ●	compare	0	0
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 0 In terms of specification, there are no significant differences between these lenses. HIDE
Tokina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 • ⌀77 akaQuantaray AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5		2000 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Internal zooming · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:9.28 vs 1:12) · Heavier (400g vs 300g) · Slightly larger (77mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AT-X Pro AF 20-35mm F/2.8 • ⌀77	Pro	1998 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Slightly larger magnification (1:11.6 vs 1:12) · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (585g vs 300g) · Larger (85.5mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AF 20-35mm F/3.5-4.5 II • ⌀77		1996 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Much heavier (500g vs 300g) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AF 20-35mm F/3.5-4.5 • ⌀72		1990 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Much heavier (460g vs 300g) · Smaller filter size (72mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Minolta/Sony A mount (1) · APS-C
Sigma 18-35mm F/1.8 DC HSM \| A • ⌀72		2013 ●	compare	8	2
Advantages: 8 Disadvantages: 2 · APS-C · Internal zooming · Constant F/1.8 speed across the focal length range · Much faster @ 18mm · Much faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.3 vs 1:12) · Hyper Sonic Motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (810g vs 300g) · Much larger (121mm vs 69.5mm) · Smaller filter size (72mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Nikon F mount (22)
Cosina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC Digital • ⌀77		2004 ●	compare	1	0
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 0 · Optimized for digital cameras HIDE
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm F/4G ED VR • ⌀77	Pro	2010 ●	compare	10	2
Advantages: 10 Disadvantages: 2 · In production · Wider focal range · Wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/4 speed across the focal length range · Slightly slower @ 16mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4 vs 1:12) · Silent Wave Motor · Has focus mode selector (M/A - M) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Has image stabilizer · Much heavier (680g vs 300g) · Much larger (125mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Nikon AF Nikkor 18-35mm F/3.5-4.5D IF-ED • ⌀77		2000 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.33m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:6.67 vs 1:12) · Heavier (370g vs 300g) · Slightly larger (82.5mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm F/2.8D IF-ED • ⌀77	Pro	1999 ●	compare	7	2
Advantages: 7 Disadvantages: 2 · In production · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.55 vs 1:12) · Silent Wave Motor · Has focus mode selector (M/A - M) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (745g vs 300g) · Much larger (106mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Nikon AF Nikkor 20-35mm F/2.8D IF • ⌀77	Pro	1993 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Has focus mode selector (A - M) · Much heavier (640g vs 300g) · Larger (94mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 18-35mm F/3.5-4.5G ED • ⌀77		2013 ●	compare	6	2
Advantages: 6 Disadvantages: 2 · In production · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:5 vs 1:12) · Silent Wave Motor · Has focus mode selector (M/A - M) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Heavier (385g vs 300g) · Larger (95mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 17-35mm F/2.8-4 EX DG [HSM] • ⌀77	Pro	2003 ●	compare	4	2
Advantages: 4 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.5 vs 1:12) · Hyper Sonic Motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - M) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (560g vs 300g) · Larger (86.2mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 20-40mm F/2.8 EX DG Aspherical IF • ⌀82	Pro	2001 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Wider focal range · Slightly longer reach at the longer end · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Faster @ 40mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.6 vs 1:12) · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (595g vs 300g) · Much larger (107.8mm vs 69.5mm) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 18-35mm F/3.5-4.5 Aspherical ZEN • ⌀82 akaQuantaray Tech-10 AF 18-35mm F/3.5-4.5		1994 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) HIDE
Sigma 21-35mm F/3.5-4.2 ZEN • ⌀77		1988 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Floating element system · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller magnification (1:12.5 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (480g vs 300g) · Much larger (104.5mm vs 69.5mm) · Built-in lens hood NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 17-35mm F/2.8-4 EX Aspherical [HSM] • ⌀82	Pro	1999 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · Slightly larger magnification (1:11.5 vs 1:12) · Heavier (400g vs 300g) · Larger (83.5mm vs 69.5mm) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron SP AF 17-35mm F/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical [IF] A05 • ⌀77	Pro	2003 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:5.4 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (440g vs 300g) · Larger (86.5mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron SP AF 20-40mm F/2.7-3.5 Aspherical [IF] 166D • ⌀77		1994 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider focal range · Slightly longer reach at the longer end · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Slightly faster @ 40mm · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly larger magnification (1:10.2 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (525g vs 300g) · Slightly larger (81mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron SP AF 20-40mm F/2.7-3.5 Aspherical [IF] 266D • ⌀77		2000 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Wider focal range · Slightly longer reach at the longer end · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Slightly faster @ 40mm · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly larger magnification (1:10.2 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (525g vs 300g) · Slightly larger (81mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 A10 • ⌀77		2002 ●	compare	0	0
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 0 In terms of specification, there are no significant differences between these lenses. HIDE
Tamron 17-35mm F/2.8-4 Di OSD A037 • ⌀77	Pro	2018 ●	compare	6	2
Advantages: 6 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Electromagnetic diaphragm control system · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.9 vs 1:12) · Optimized Silent Drive · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (460g vs 300g) · Larger (90mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 • ⌀77 akaQuantaray AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5		2000 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Internal zooming · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:9.28 vs 1:12) · Heavier (400g vs 300g) · Slightly larger (77mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AT-X Pro AF 20-35mm F/2.8 • ⌀77	Pro	1998 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Slightly larger magnification (1:11.6 vs 1:12) · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (585g vs 300g) · Larger (85.5mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AT-X Pro AF SD 17-35mm F/4 [IF] • ⌀82	Pro	2011 ●	compare	6	2
Advantages: 6 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/4 speed across the focal length range · Slightly slower @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.82 vs 1:12) · Micromotor · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (600g vs 300g) · Larger (94.5mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AF 20-35mm F/3.5-4.5 II • ⌀77		1996 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Much heavier (500g vs 300g) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AF 20-35mm F/3.5-4.5 • ⌀72		1990 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Much heavier (460g vs 300g) · Smaller filter size (72mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina atx-i 17-35mm F/4 FF • ⌀82	Pro	2020 ●	compare	7	2
Advantages: 7 Disadvantages: 2 · In production · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/4 speed across the focal length range · Slightly slower @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.82 vs 1:12) · Silent Drive Module · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (569g vs 300g) · Larger (95mm vs 69.5mm) · Weather-sealed lens mount · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Nikon F mount (1) · APS-C
Sigma 18-35mm F/1.8 DC HSM \| A • ⌀72		2013 ●	compare	9	2
Advantages: 9 Disadvantages: 2 · In production · APS-C · Internal zooming · Constant F/1.8 speed across the focal length range · Much faster @ 18mm · Much faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.3 vs 1:12) · Hyper Sonic Motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (810g vs 300g) · Much larger (121mm vs 69.5mm) · Smaller filter size (72mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Pentax K mount (12)
Cosina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 MC Digital • ⌀77		2004 ●	compare	1	0
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 0 · Optimized for digital cameras HIDE
smc Pentax-FA 20-35mm F/4 AL • ⌀58		1998 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Constant F/4 speed across the focal length range · Slightly slower @ 20mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:6.25 vs 1:12) · Slightly lighter (245g vs 300g) · Smaller filter size (58mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
smc Pentax-FA J 18-35mm F/4-5.6 AL • ⌀67		2003 ●	compare	3	0
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly slower @ 18mm · Slightly slower @ 35mm · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:5.56 vs 1:12) · Lighter (203g vs 300g) · Smaller filter size (67mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 17-35mm F/2.8-4 EX DG [HSM] • ⌀77	Pro	2003 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.27m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.5 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (560g vs 300g) · Larger (86.2mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 20-40mm F/2.8 EX DG Aspherical IF • ⌀82	Pro	2001 ●	compare	5	2
Advantages: 5 Disadvantages: 2 · Wider focal range · Slightly longer reach at the longer end · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Faster @ 40mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.6 vs 1:12) · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (595g vs 300g) · Much larger (107.8mm vs 69.5mm) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Sigma 18-35mm F/3.5-4.5 Aspherical ZEN • ⌀82 akaQuantaray Tech-10 AF 18-35mm F/3.5-4.5		1994 ●	compare	2	0
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 0 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Aspherical design · Floating element system · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) HIDE
Sigma 17-35mm F/2.8-4 EX Aspherical [HSM] • ⌀82	Pro	1999 ●	compare	0	2
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · Slightly larger magnification (1:11.5 vs 1:12) · Heavier (400g vs 300g) · Larger (83.5mm vs 69.5mm) · Larger filter size (82mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tamron SP AF 17-35mm F/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical [IF] A05 • ⌀77	Pro	2003 ●	compare	2	2
Advantages: 2 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly wider focal range · Slightly wider field of view at the shorter end · Slightly faster @ 17mm · Slightly faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · Less diaphragm blades (7 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.30m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:5.4 vs 1:12) · Much heavier (440g vs 300g) · Larger (86.5mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5 • ⌀77 akaQuantaray AF 19-35mm F/3.5-4.5		2000 ●	compare	1	1
Advantages: 1 Disadvantages: 1 · Internal zooming · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Slightly larger magnification (1:9.28 vs 1:12) · Heavier (400g vs 300g) · Slightly larger (77mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AT-X Pro AF 20-35mm F/2.8 • ⌀77	Pro	1998 ●	compare	3	2
Advantages: 3 Disadvantages: 2 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Internal zooming · Constant F/2.8 speed across the focal length range · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Faster @ 35mm · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Slightly larger magnification (1:11.6 vs 1:12) · Features Focus Clutch Mechanism · Much heavier (585g vs 300g) · Larger (85.5mm vs 69.5mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AF 20-35mm F/3.5-4.5 II • ⌀77		1996 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Much heavier (500g vs 300g) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE
Tokina AF 20-35mm F/3.5-4.5 • ⌀72		1990 ●	compare	0	1
Advantages: 0 Disadvantages: 1 · Slightly narrower focal range · Slightly narrower field of view at the shorter end · Less diaphragm blades (6 vs 8) · Slightly smaller closest focusing distance (0.40m vs 0.50m) · Much heavier (460g vs 300g) · Smaller filter size (72mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE

■Pentax K mount (2) · APS-C
HD Pentax-DA 20-40mm F/2.8-4 ED DC WR Limited • ⌀55		2013 ●	compare	8	0
Advantages: 8 Disadvantages: 0 · In production · APS-C · Slightly faster @ 20mm · Slightly faster @ 40mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:5 vs 1:12) · Micromotor · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Weather-sealed · Fluorine coating · Smaller filter size (55mm vs 77mm) HIDE
Sigma 18-35mm F/1.8 DC HSM \| A • ⌀72		2013 ●	compare	8	2
Advantages: 8 Disadvantages: 2 · APS-C · Internal zooming · Constant F/1.8 speed across the focal length range · Much faster @ 18mm · Much faster @ 35mm · Optimized for digital cameras · Aspherical design · More diaphragm blades (9 vs 8) · Smaller closest focusing distance (0.28m vs 0.50m) · Larger magnification (1:4.3 vs 1:12) · Hyper Sonic Motor · Has focus mode selector (AF - MF) · Manual focus override in autofocus mode · Much heavier (810g vs 300g) · Much larger (121mm vs 69.5mm) · Smaller filter size (72mm vs 77mm) NOTE: Approximate weight and length were used for comparison purposes. HIDE